Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<0jrs4jp9snu9l77n717ut2so3p3mdc7vnu@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us11.netnews.com!not-for-mail X-Trace: DXC=dbaicJclBh<:kVVNNmTI45HWonT5<]0T=djI?Uho:Xe;lL51CP6LDL<95GMl]75=81V>J6mAo<6:37@<I4Rf8bA1l3[[dIf;_m62Do^b@=QS77 X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Do Microsoft’sCopilot+ PCs Require Linux? (was: Do Microsoft’sCopilot+ PCs Require Linux?) Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 18:16:21 -0400 Message-ID: <0jrs4jp9snu9l77n717ut2so3p3mdc7vnu@4ax.com> References: <v2k7km$12v2d$1@dont-email.me> <lZKdnTjxE6Cwl9P7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@supernews.com> <664e55ed$0$8491$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <x9GdnREA8JPw9dP7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@supernews.com> User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Lines: 47 NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Trace: 1716416180 reader.netnews.com 2363144 127.0.0.1:33287 Bytes: 2905 Tyrone <none@none.none> wrote: >On May 22, 2024 at 4:30:38?PM EDT, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 5/22/2024 11:07 AM, Tyrone wrote: >> >>> This makes me think that Windows is FINALLY going to be Unix (Linux) based. >> >> Keep hope alive! > >I'm not hoping for anything. I really don't care. I have personally given up >on Windows. > >But for Windows to have any future at all, it needs to become Unix. Because >the rest of the world IS Unix. MS can't remain on (shrinking) Windows Island >forever. > >That one needs to have Linux installed on Windows via WSL to do ANY "AI" dev >work is a very large admission by MS that Windows is - indeed - a hopeless, >outdated mess. > >Apple did it, in one of the smoothest OS transitions ever. Then they moved >from Power PC to Intel and then to Arm. And they now have an astonishing >range of products all running on Unix, which are all forks of MacOS Unix. >None of that would have been possible with the original MacOS. Because Unix >is portable and scalable. Old MacOS was not, and neither is Old Windows. > >One would think that "The World's Largest Software Company" can manage it. I hate to say it, but you're utterly wrong. M$ replacing their kernel with the Linux kernel would do NOTHING. You don't know anything. Windows' kernel is no less sleek than Linux. The bloat is all on top. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.