| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<0rjbsjtc7mvftedb8vodlf68vlo8rshecu@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Ove Interest? Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 10:51:22 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 41 Message-ID: <0rjbsjtc7mvftedb8vodlf68vlo8rshecu@4ax.com> References: <vop413$3ojl2$4@dont-email.me> <voq66s$1vl7$2@dont-email.me> <m1bnsbFl7s3U1@mid.individual.net> <voqitv$4aek$2@dont-email.me> <voqnbk$59iv$1@dont-email.me> <vor1g7$70t2$1@dont-email.me> <jr62rjlal8ra20q6uqdhmqti7hvif8mpps@4ax.com> <9ed2rjdp07d6kh573u6ghkdbcnjt0t1lrt@4ax.com> <voro9s$ekdl$1@dont-email.me> <dgc3rjph84p7gn62it0p52thhg0fb9lvvh@4ax.com> <82g3rj196rf6gou38ev0k232eu5h419jhp@4ax.com> <votfeh$ns08$3@dont-email.me> <k6kxP.210609$TBhc.34557@fx16.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 16:51:26 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="794107a103600747a511783a41e1cbeb"; logging-data="1456706"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/2YX3lsN7C1AUnbJQQ6JXaql4iE4jCfXI=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:L43yXXaQG491AjB//A0CGPhgtaM= On Mon, 03 Mar 2025 15:43:12 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Sun Feb 16 14:48:31 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote: >> On 2/16/2025 5:48 AM, John B. wrote: >> > >> > well the gun in the house thing is certainly, correct.... as long as >> > someone in the house wants to shoot you :-) >> > >> > But I suspect that many people live in houses where the other partner >> > doesn't want to shoot his, hers, its, partner. >> >> What you posted, John, is blindingly obvious. But it avoids the point >> that I've made, and that data has confirmed. >> >> A very large proportion of people with guns in the home say they have >> the gun for "protection." That is, they believe they are less likely to >> be subject to serious violence if they have a gun readily available. >> >> The data is clear that their assumption is false. The people with guns >> in the house are _more_ likely to suffer serious violence, and that's >> true no matter where they live. The serious violence normally does not >> come from outsiders. It comes from someone in their own house. >> >> Beyond that, the gun isn't very likely to be useful against outside >> aggressors, as your own personal story indicated. >> >> I know you love guns, but what I've posted are the facts. You should be >> able to love guns while understanding that their value is highly overrated. > > > > >Frank, there is something seriously damaged in your brain. What other people do that is not criminal, is none of your business. So anything you say you want to make any other belief a crime. This is so sick that you should be committed to a loony bin. Guns frighten Krygowski. We probably shouldn't castigate him for expressing that fear. -- C'est bon Soloman