Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Lousy non culture follows bogus physics
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 06:34:26 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <0s4akl-epsb1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <edf10d817223ffd88b82f1e254d64959@www.novabbs.org> <1049af1$102pu$1@tor.dont-email.me> <eff53e0b9f87998bd6bad9531ca87b90@www.novabbs.org> <104bu1f$1llg9$1@tor.dont-email.me> <1af92d6a2098508fdf6c366780673e73@www.novabbs.org> <kke6kl-haj61.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <7babcc353780459b6c6d48a79566190e@www.novabbs.org>
Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 15:46:06 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e8dfba53f9143f41bbeebf8becc9af60";
	logging-data="2289731"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+JUVQvRXYlx2PML3NRdJjU"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-143-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZpkL2FW8kqPn+8H84ZfcXFQ8g0o=

Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 3:56:38 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 19:32:00 +0000, Aether Regained wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bertitaylor:> On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 19:46:00 +0000, Aether Regained wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Arindam aka @Bertietaylor,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What makes you so confidently dismiss the positron? Aren't cloud chamber
>>>>>> traces like the ones below irrefutable proof of positrons:
>>>>>
>>>>> We don't see any need for the positron in the universe for the
>>>>> explanation of its workings.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for cloud chamber stuff it shows not just positrons but also Hell
>>>>> knows how many so called fundamental particles. All as useless as
>>>>> positrons. Hocus pocus.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> True, there is a particle zoo out there. Andrew Pickering's
>>>> "Constructing Quarks" and Alexander Unzicker's "The Higgs Fake" go in
>>>> depth into this topic. But, just for this reason, throwing out the
>>>> positron is like "throwing out the baby with the bath water". The
>>>> evidence for the positron is a lot stronger than the evidence for say
>>>> quarks.
>>>
>>> Hell, no. All the particle bashing stuff using expensive equipment shows
>>> that you can bash up protons into smaller pieces.
>>
>> Is the reason you disparage expensive equipment that you can't afford
>> any equipment Arindam?
> 
> Arindam had enough money to buy and enough talent to make the equipment
> he needed to prove his new physics. Genius is hindered by lying
> mediocrities who hide behind huge spends of public money.

If you mean your low speed pipe roller with a ruler for instrumentation,
that proved nothing other than you don't know how to do an experiment
Arindam.


-- 
penninojim@yahoo.com