Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<1001tmp$2e83l$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: men in women's bicycle races Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 13:10:16 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 86 Message-ID: <1001tmp$2e83l$2@dont-email.me> References: <m89a6nF36qmU1@mid.individual.net> <m72v1k1pee4l4g06ns7q8fdlm4nb55a619@4ax.com> <m8aflmF8ssdU1@mid.individual.net> <ikm02kddu7p3ll0qs2smco0b6hmdn231vj@4ax.com> <m8bj6fFe8uqU1@mid.individual.net> <vvst3v$13hkj$3@dont-email.me> <j6242k569u9eni0ur9d12tadm4pbhtglp5@4ax.com> <vvtetn$17jpq$6@dont-email.me> <vvtrbl$1ad5p$1@dont-email.me> <vvuhqn$1j14s$1@dont-email.me> <vvvet8$1qme2$1@dont-email.me> <10002e8$1v9ra$1@dont-email.me> <10005ui$20esh$1@dont-email.me> <p6t82khf38q8ug2054uunlp0v268jditti@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 13:10:18 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="69c092ed2c8fa33ba1013d5f625308a7"; logging-data="2564213"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18HYMBwZmQCEXr7cwjtCTQu" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:fURakyl8xops1Qt8D1rkC1mAyPs= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <p6t82khf38q8ug2054uunlp0v268jditti@4ax.com> Bytes: 5307 Am 14.05.2025 um 12:47 schrieb Catrike Ryder: > On Tue, 13 May 2025 14:18:42 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: > >> On 5/13/2025 1:18 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>> On 5/13/2025 8:45 AM, AMuzi wrote: >>>> On 5/12/2025 11:29 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>>>> On 5/12/2025 6:05 PM, AMuzi wrote: >>>>>> On 5/12/2025 1:33 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But Mr. Timid Tricyclist just won't let it go. It >>>>>>> allows him to hide from discussing the current >>>>>>> administration's crazy incompetence. What a dupe. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Pick an administration. Any administration. Select any >>>>>> of myriad examples of 'crazy incompetence'. >>>>>> >>>>>> USS Gettysburg shot down a fighter from her own carrier >>>>>> group (USS Truman) in the Biden administration in December. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then USS Truman lost two fighters overboard (one from >>>>>> sliding tow vehicle in April, one landing arrest failure >>>>>> in May.) in the 2d Trump administration. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.businessinsider.com/us-navy-aircraft- >>>>>> carrier- red-sea- lost- another-super-hornet-2025-5?op=1 >>>>>> >>>>>> One never runs out of examples. >>>>> >>>>> Is each military mishap the fault of an executive >>>>> administration? I'd think that even the appointment of, >>>>> say, a low experience drunken Fox network personality >>>>> would require quite a bit of time to noticeably affect >>>>> the competence of the world's largest military. >>>>> >>>>> Appointing an egotistical and inexperienced cyber dude to >>>>> pull in other cyber dudes with no relevant >>>>> qualifications, to hack away randomly at every possible >>>>> government agency, firing then rehiring hundreds or >>>>> thousands of competent workers? That's administrative >>>>> incompetence - one example among many. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Well, yes, your term 'crazy incompetence' pervades >>>> governments (not only US Federal government!) in every >>>> administration. Hayek brilliantly wrote on the inherent >>>> failures of large bureaucracies, by their nature, well >>>> before key exemplars were born! >>> >>> First, it takes a large administration to run a large >>> institution, and a very large administration to run a large >>> country. I doubt there are any exceptions. And in any large >>> administation you'll be able to find examples of anything - >>> competence, incompetence, stupidity, brilliance. Isn't "we >>> have one of everything" one of your talking points? >>> >>> That does NOT mean all administrations are equal. The >>> unproductive chaos generated by unleashing Musk and his >>> buddy boys seems unique in our history. I doubt one >>> legitimate scientist thinks Kennedy is fully sane, let alone >>> competent. And the "Hillary Emails!!!" crew is giving an >>> astonishing pass to the signal chat leaks. I could list >>> more, but I think the current administration is on its way >>> toward record incompetence on multiple fronts. >>> >>> If you're defending all that, I'm curious about your thought >>> processes. Will it be "Yeah, but Obama wore a brown suit"? >>> >>> >> The British Empire in the late Victorian era ran with a >> skimpy budget and a slim staff. >> >> https://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/uk-government-did-we-rule-the-empire-with-4000-civil-servants/ >> >> And Britain didn't even have a 10th Amendment! >> >> Excess in funding and excess in hiring leads to 'mission >> creep' outside lawful useful limits. As we see. >> >> p.s. thanks for snipping my example. There are more. > > Krugowski's snipping is his cowardly method of avoiding issues he > can't deal with. Can you please stop repeating the same accusations? Independent on whether they are true or false, they are extremely boring.