Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<1001tmp$2e83l$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: men in women's bicycle races
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 13:10:16 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 86
Message-ID: <1001tmp$2e83l$2@dont-email.me>
References: <m89a6nF36qmU1@mid.individual.net>
 <m72v1k1pee4l4g06ns7q8fdlm4nb55a619@4ax.com>
 <m8aflmF8ssdU1@mid.individual.net>
 <ikm02kddu7p3ll0qs2smco0b6hmdn231vj@4ax.com>
 <m8bj6fFe8uqU1@mid.individual.net> <vvst3v$13hkj$3@dont-email.me>
 <j6242k569u9eni0ur9d12tadm4pbhtglp5@4ax.com> <vvtetn$17jpq$6@dont-email.me>
 <vvtrbl$1ad5p$1@dont-email.me> <vvuhqn$1j14s$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvvet8$1qme2$1@dont-email.me> <10002e8$1v9ra$1@dont-email.me>
 <10005ui$20esh$1@dont-email.me> <p6t82khf38q8ug2054uunlp0v268jditti@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 13:10:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="69c092ed2c8fa33ba1013d5f625308a7";
	logging-data="2564213"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18HYMBwZmQCEXr7cwjtCTQu"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fURakyl8xops1Qt8D1rkC1mAyPs=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <p6t82khf38q8ug2054uunlp0v268jditti@4ax.com>
Bytes: 5307

Am 14.05.2025 um 12:47 schrieb Catrike Ryder:
> On Tue, 13 May 2025 14:18:42 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/13/2025 1:18 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>>> On 5/13/2025 8:45 AM, AMuzi wrote:
>>>> On 5/12/2025 11:29 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>>>>> On 5/12/2025 6:05 PM, AMuzi wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/12/2025 1:33 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But Mr. Timid Tricyclist just won't let it go. It
>>>>>>> allows him to hide from discussing the current
>>>>>>> administration's crazy incompetence. What a dupe.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pick an administration. Any administration. Select any
>>>>>> of myriad examples of 'crazy incompetence'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> USS Gettysburg shot down a fighter from her own carrier
>>>>>> group (USS Truman) in the Biden administration in December.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then USS Truman lost two fighters overboard (one from
>>>>>> sliding tow vehicle in April, one landing arrest failure
>>>>>> in May.) in the 2d Trump administration.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.businessinsider.com/us-navy-aircraft-
>>>>>> carrier- red-sea- lost- another-super-hornet-2025-5?op=1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One never runs out of examples.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is each military mishap the fault of an executive
>>>>> administration? I'd think that even the appointment of,
>>>>> say, a low experience drunken Fox network personality
>>>>> would require quite a bit of time to noticeably affect
>>>>> the competence of the world's largest military.
>>>>>
>>>>> Appointing an egotistical and inexperienced cyber dude to
>>>>> pull in other cyber dudes with no relevant
>>>>> qualifications, to hack away randomly at every possible
>>>>> government agency, firing then rehiring hundreds or
>>>>> thousands of competent workers? That's administrative
>>>>> incompetence - one example among many.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, yes, your term 'crazy incompetence' pervades
>>>> governments (not only US Federal government!)  in every
>>>> administration. Hayek brilliantly wrote on the inherent
>>>> failures of large bureaucracies, by their nature, well
>>>> before key exemplars were born!
>>>
>>> First, it takes a large administration to run a large
>>> institution, and a very large administration to run a large
>>> country. I doubt there are any exceptions. And in any large
>>> administation you'll be able to find examples of anything -
>>> competence, incompetence, stupidity, brilliance. Isn't "we
>>> have one of everything" one of your talking points?
>>>
>>> That does NOT mean all administrations are equal. The
>>> unproductive chaos generated by unleashing Musk and his
>>> buddy boys seems unique in our history. I doubt one
>>> legitimate scientist thinks Kennedy is fully sane, let alone
>>> competent. And the "Hillary Emails!!!" crew is giving an
>>> astonishing pass to the signal chat leaks. I could list
>>> more, but I think the current administration is on its way
>>> toward record incompetence on multiple fronts.
>>>
>>> If you're defending all that, I'm curious about your thought
>>> processes. Will it be "Yeah, but Obama wore a brown suit"?
>>>
>>>
>> The British Empire in the late Victorian era ran with a
>> skimpy budget and a slim staff.
>>
>> https://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/uk-government-did-we-rule-the-empire-with-4000-civil-servants/
>>
>> And Britain didn't even have a 10th Amendment!
>>
>> Excess in funding and excess in hiring leads to 'mission
>> creep' outside lawful useful limits. As we see.
>>
>> p.s. thanks for snipping my example. There are more.
> 
> Krugowski's snipping is his cowardly method of avoiding issues he
> can't deal with. 

Can you please stop repeating the same accusations?  Independent on 
whether they are true or false, they are extremely boring.