Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: The Media Finally Finds Some Refugees They Hate
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 04:30:46 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 131
Message-ID: <1001tqc$2f940$6@dont-email.me>
References: <1000d4p$21tc1$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 13:12:13 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b105664ff4d206882da3209e0f00ff8b";
	logging-data="2598016"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18dOt+og7zi4oH1nOe1WpE547zN4xzEkww="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zIbd7MVIRHobRQMUFamYF8oylIw=
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)

In article <1000d4p$21tc1$1@dont-email.me>, atropos@mac.com wrote:

>As we know, for the past four and a half years, the media has shown no concern
>over the millions of people Biden let flood into the country, ostensibly
>claiming to be 'refugees' because they've been coached to say so by everyone
>from their home governments, to American NGOs run by leftist activists, to
>even officials in our own government. The only time the media rouses itself
>from its stupor to complain about anything regarding the millions of illegals
>in our country pretending to be refugees is when their stories fall apart
>before an immigration court and they're ordered deported. Then the media can't
>wait to broadcast one sob story after another about them and how inutterably
>cruel and horrible America is.
>
>But just for the sake of argument, if you had to imagine a hypothetical
>scenario where 59 refugees somehow *did* get the media's attention and also
>triggered a massive outrage cycle in the process, what do you think might be
>the reason?
>
>What would it take for CNN, MSNBC, and all the networks to lose their minds
>over 59 refugees who have been settled in this country by the federal
>government? What kind of heinous terrorist attack would those 59 people have
>to be plotting? What Chinese-developed bat virus would they have to be
>carrying? How many Kanye West lyrics would they have to sing on the plane in
>order to make the national news media-- for the first time in recorded
>history-- demand that a plane full of refugees be turned around and sent back
>to where it came from?
>
>Well, yesterday we learned the answer to that question and it turns out that
>if you want the media to adopt a hard-line anti-refugee stance, the refugees
>don't actually have to do anything. They don't have to say a word, even a
>naughty word. Instead, the refugees just have to commit the unforgivable
>cardinal sin... of being white.
>
>Yep, if the federal government takes a break from importing hordes of
>ungrateful Somalis and Haitians and Venezuelans-- if only for a minute-- and
>decides instead to rescue 59 well-mannered white people, then all hell will
>break loose.
>
>Before we get into the specifics of why these particular white people are
>fleeing South Africa and why the Left is so enraged by them, just take a look
>at the lot of them:
>
>They're waving American flags (not the flag of the country they're fleeing, as
>so many of the illegal alien refugees do), they're holding their children, who
>are well-behaved, they're speaking English, they're arriving here as intact
>family units, they're respectful to American officials, they're not accepting
>our largesse, then complaining about it or saying it's not good enough. In
>other words, they're acting like responsible, well-adjusted, productive
>people.
>
>And under the circumstances, that's no small feat. They've been subjected to
>decades of persecution in their native land solely based on their skin color,
>under the theory that they deserve to be persecuted because they're white
>colonizers. Never mind the fact that most of them can trace their lineage in
>South Africa back 15 generations, nearly 400 years. If after four centuries,
>you're not considered 'native' to a land, then the word native has no useful
>meaning.
>
>But the funny thing about the Bantu, the black population of South Africa
>engaging in this white oppression, is that they themselves were colonizers.
>They pushed out and/or assimilated the Khoisan people who lived in the area
>that later became South Africa.
>
>It's estimated that one white farmer is murdered every five days in South
>Africa and some of these executions are brutal. It doesn't stop with
>executions, either. According to Newsweek even when the Bantu activists leave
>the farmers alive, they routinely show up and raid the property, taking
>anything of value, and beat the families, including the children. Females,
>both adults and children are also frequently raped.
>
>The government of South Africa, however pretends this isn't happening, and
>claims it's perfectly safe for whites in South Africa, which leftist activists
>parrot as if it's true. They accuse Afrikaners of inventing all the homicides
>and torture to which they're being subjected.
>
>However, the government itself gives lie to its own propaganda as it passes
>legislation allowing it seize land from white farmers without compensation,
>and turning it over to black people. That is the express purpose of the law:
>to steal land from white people and give it to black people. And, predictably,
>the white people involved think that's evil. Because it is.
>
>And while this is going on, chants of "Kill the Boer!" are being led by black
>politicians everywhere from soccer stadiums to the floor of the National
>Assembly.
>
>So this is actual, verifiable government persecution. These Afrikaners are not
>being coached by some leftist NGO to make up a sob story so some left-wing
>administration lets them into the country, when all they really want is access
>to the U.S. labor market so they can get a better or job, or even worse and
>more commonly, they want access to the U.S. welfare state. That's normally how
>asylum claims work. They're pretty much all fraudulent and everyone knows it.
>
>But this is very different. The government of South Africa has given itself
>authority to seize private property without compensation, which would be bad
>enough even if applied fairly, but they then set about implementing that law
>only against white people. "You're white so we're taking your home from you
>and giving you nothing in return." If that's not official persecution, then
>what is?
>
>Asylum laws are meant for precisely this scenario: people being targeted by
>their government based on characteristics they cannot control. But across the
>legacy media, we're told that even if the stories of abuse and murder are
>true, these Afrikaners should just stay in South Africa and take it because,
>being white and all, they're not worthy of refugee status. Biden's former
>Under-Secretary of State on MEET THE PRESS yesterday: "It's just a small
>handful of white farmers that have been killed in the last 10 years."
>
>Just a small handful. Who's writing this guy's notes? Ilhan Omar's speech
>writer? "Some people did some things."
>
>A little bit of race-targeted murder, torture, and rape and overt theft is
>just a small price to pay for the sins of their
>great-great-great-grandfathers.
>
>Just imagine what they have planned for you if they ever get the power to
>implement it.

The left finally finds refugees they don’t like as Trump allows South Africans to 
seek refugee status in the 
US. Pope Leo's brother, Louis Prevost, who has posted controversial views before, 
says he's planning on toning 
it down when it comes to social media. The Episcopal Church announces that it is 
terminating its partnership 
with the government to resettle refugees after Trump’s South African move. President 
& Executive Director of 
American Suppressor Association, Knox Williams, joins us on Congress' inability to 
fix the unconstitutional 
NFA tax scheme. 

https://youtu.be/PV4L_YWXHU4?si=-AvHsN3RCD3uQzBB