| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1002bqd$2i4bk$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly
met --- WDH
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 10:11:09 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <1002bqd$2i4bk$6@dont-email.me>
References: <vvte01$14pca$29@dont-email.me>
<fceb852a146ff7238c5be7a0adf420474a8fb5df@i2pn2.org>
<vvuc7a$1deu5$5@dont-email.me>
<c5a47349d8625838f1ee2782c216e0ebf9223bc6@i2pn2.org>
<vvuj6l$1j6s0$3@dont-email.me>
<b78af2e0b52f178683b672b45ba1bc2012023aaf@i2pn2.org>
<1000dlc$21dtc$5@dont-email.me> <1000qdb$24gr3$4@dont-email.me>
<1000rir$24jh0$3@dont-email.me>
<9ddc882256862ab48cce9faa371f3f578a6b379a@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 17:11:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1b4c815c0318038d25de37dcdc1ad225";
logging-data="2691444"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Q3elyx1GbepgdRNjurPMd"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:b7kYO2lXe9vwq2ehOiUDnD+nkig=
In-Reply-To: <9ddc882256862ab48cce9faa371f3f578a6b379a@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250514-2, 5/14/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
On 5/14/2025 9:32 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Tue, 13 May 2025 20:27:54 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 5/13/2025 8:07 PM, dbush wrote:
>>> On 5/13/2025 5:30 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 5/13/2025 6:43 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 5/13/25 12:52 AM, olcott wrote:
>
>>>>>> If my logic was based on lies and equivocation then you could
>>>>>> provide actual reasoning that corrects my errors.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hae.
> *crickets.
>
>>>>>> It is truism that simulating termination analyzers must report on
>>>>>> the behavior of their input as if they themselves never aborted this
>>>>>> simulation:
> They themselves, but not the HHH called by the input.
>
<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its
input D until H correctly determines that its simulated D
would never stop running unless aborted then
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
HHH(DDD) must report on what the behavior of DDD would
be if this same HHH never aborted. It is dead obviously
the same as infinite recursion.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer