Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: How could HHH report on the behavior of its caller?
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 22:02:13 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <1003lfm$2u41h$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1003g30$2pfv4$1@dont-email.me>
 <fcabeaf49bf29636824f5e150e62094c446fc123@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 05:02:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="66a8f7019eb14522c3a913b396c0eecb";
	logging-data="3084337"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/XctvIltbjwr3wNIEi+z7r"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:P5xzEYHWep87iL7PT+nM7fGEwYc=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250514-4, 5/14/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <fcabeaf49bf29636824f5e150e62094c446fc123@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 2008

On 5/14/2025 9:54 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 5/14/25 9:30 PM, olcott wrote:
>> void DDD()
>> {
>>    HHH(DDD);
>>    return;
>> }
>>
>> int main()
>> {
>>    DDD();
>> }
>>
>> If HHH cannot report on the behavior of its caller
>> because this is a ridiculous requirement then how
>> can HHH report on the direct execution of DDD()
>> (AKA its caller).
>>
> 
> Because it is given the code of DDD, and thus doesn't need to know about 
> "It caller"
> 

Unless it does know about its caller
The only directly executed DDD() that actually exists
no HHH can possibly know about any directly executed DDD().


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer