Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning
 instead of rhetoric -- RP
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:22:37 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <1004ipu$331gh$11@dont-email.me>
References: <vvm948$34h6g$2@dont-email.me> <1000qss$24jh0$2@dont-email.me>
 <1000rfv$24gr3$6@dont-email.me> <1000s0e$24sr2$1@dont-email.me>
 <1000s6d$24gr3$8@dont-email.me> <1000t1a$24sr2$4@dont-email.me>
 <1000t8e$24gr3$11@dont-email.me> <1000vs5$29e7u$1@dont-email.me>
 <100101g$24gr3$14@dont-email.me> <10011b6$29e7u$4@dont-email.me>
 <10012le$24gr3$17@dont-email.me> <1001370$2a1j4$1@dont-email.me>
 <100172f$2ao7o$1@dont-email.me> <10017lb$2aojt$1@dont-email.me>
 <100184e$2asas$1@dont-email.me> <10018ij$2aut2$1@dont-email.me>
 <100197l$2asas$2@dont-email.me> <1002ev3$2i4bk$20@dont-email.me>
 <1002fk4$2j9i8$1@dont-email.me> <1002h7l$2jlcp$1@dont-email.me>
 <1002j46$2k04b$2@dont-email.me> <1002jgi$2k00a$2@dont-email.me>
 <1002kl4$2k04c$2@dont-email.me> <1002kui$2kb74$2@dont-email.me>
 <1002ljq$2k04b$4@dont-email.me> <1002mpa$2kb74$4@dont-email.me>
 <1002obs$2k04b$6@dont-email.me> <1002p67$2l877$1@dont-email.me>
 <1003146$2mbr6$9@dont-email.me> <10031o7$2mtsb$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:22:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f01669ad5be46e37f414bf63360950cd";
	logging-data="3245585"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ZHHHb6ic5Om/vOBvEBH8I"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SbZoUE2a/rA7ElY917Uvxp+Lozs=
Content-Language: nl, en-GB
In-Reply-To: <10031o7$2mtsb$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4312

Op 14.mei.2025 om 23:25 schreef olcott:
> On 5/14/2025 4:14 PM, dbush wrote:
>> On 5/14/2025 2:59 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 5/14/2025 1:45 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>> On 14/05/2025 19:18, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 5/14/2025 12:58 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>>>> On 14/05/2025 18:46, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>> PAY ATTENTION !!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, my dear dear chap - if I thought for a moment you had anything 
>>>>>> worth paying attention to, I'd be all ears.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But you have nothing but mindless repetition, over and over and 
>>>>>> OVER. For every article you post, I can pretty much guarantee that 
>>>>>> I've read 90% of it before.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I repeat the steps that prove my point until
>>>>> someone actually pays attention to these points
>>>>> that prove I am correct.
>>>>
>>>> And how is that strategy panning out for you?
>>>>
>>>> The more you repeat, the less attention you get. All you get is 
>>>> copy- paste rebuttals of your copy-paste claims.
>>>>
>>>
>>> THERE NEVER HAS BEEN ANY ACTUAL REBUTTAL OF ANY
>>> OF MY ACTUAL CLAIMS. There has been rhetoric
>>> that stupid people could mistake as rebuttal.
>>>
>>> <MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
>>>      If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its
>>>      input D until H correctly determines that its simulated D
>>>      would never stop running unless aborted then
>>>
>>
>> And *yet again* you lie by implying Sipser agrees with your 
>> interpretation of the above when definitive proof has been repeatedly 
>> provided that he did not:
>>
> 
> If that was actually true then you could provide an
> alternative meaning for the exact words stated above.
> 
> I keep challenging you to provide this alternative
> meaning and you dodge because you know that you are
> lying about there being any alternative meaning
> FOR THE EXACT WORDS LISTED ABOVE.
> 

It has been proven many times that Sipser agreed to a vacuous statement. 
Why do you always pretend that nothing was proven, when you only did not 
understand the proofs?
Please, face the facts, not your dreams. Come out of rebuttal mode and 
try to think!
Please, face the facts, not your dreams