Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<100abhj$f572$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: BATF Folds Completely Over Forced-Reset Triggers Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 11:55:30 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: <100abhj$f572$1@dont-email.me> References: <1008v2o$6hgo$1@dont-email.me> <1009rsv$c8fs$1@dont-email.me> <100a96q$en8j$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 17:55:31 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2e291a523788eb3354a27584ac8d4b85"; logging-data="496866"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BJNW/zyzGaAZeTmXFjSidQJQJkmqQzeE=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:TnL87KhqU3ve1c+6ao6doRC4+Wg= In-Reply-To: <100a96q$en8j$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2534 On 5/17/2025 11:15 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote: >> 2025-05-16 11:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>> Awesome news. DOJ has settled the forced-reset trigger cases and agreed that >>> BATF is prohibited by the terms of the settlement agreement from ever again >>> contending that FRTs are a "machine-gun" or otherwise unlawful. > >>> https://gunrightsfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/FRT-Settlement-Agreement-FINAL.pdf > >>> I may very well go out and buy one of these for my rifle now just because I >>> can. > >> Aren't you worried about bad guys like the Vegas shooter using FRTs as >> de facto machine guns? > > Yes. I worry about assholes with guns who have decided to commit mass > murder. He had brought a lot of rifles with him and plenty of ammunition. > With or without the mechanism, he was a dangerous guy who made sure he'd > be in position to kill numerous people. Without the mechanism, the only > argument is that different people would have been killed, not that the > crime would have been prevented. "Different" people? Not *fewer* people? > He was rich. There were no circumstances in which anybody would have > questioned him as he prepared to commit the crime. > > Since there's nothing I can do about murderous rich assholes, I'm just > going to live my life. Murderous assholes mean to have a say about that...