Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<100ae8v$fouh$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: The Spanish Grid Drop-out - recently released information.
Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 09:42:03 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <100ae8v$fouh$1@dont-email.me>
References: <n-q*qgicA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
 <vvtium$18vkn$1@dont-email.me> <vvtovo$1a4th$1@dont-email.me>
 <WLHUP.255339$v2h6.142714@fx14.iad> <vvvm80$1sf5m$1@dont-email.me>
 <kB1VP.48755$JRnc.12987@fx37.iad> <0l6fflx9t.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
 <10040vj$302p5$1@dont-email.me> <4osgflxtup.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
 <jaac2k937bbjk90eidfsunt38raj9fkm42@4ax.com> <1005ioj$3ae76$1@dont-email.me>
 <1rcf02s.ms3pru17wmqoN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
 <1008rg1$1sok$1@dont-email.me> <4d0h2kln54a1kp308b4n31um1edttu3rjf@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 18:42:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c53be5ad189e61e289b4809a32a282a3";
	logging-data="517073"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/mxo7FL/mqMvEEc8gsKuY4"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:adOKh+h4U+RQu0mdH/khClFdVkA=
In-Reply-To: <4d0h2kln54a1kp308b4n31um1edttu3rjf@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2721

On 5/17/2025 5:39 AM, Joe Gwinn wrote:
>>>> This doesn't happen in aircraft.

----------------------------^^^^^^^^

>>> The ambient noise level in an aeroplane is much higher than in a house

----------------------------------^^^^^^^^^

>>> on a quiet night. (Also, look up Fletcher-Munson curves to see why 600
>>> c/s would be a lot worse than 50 or 60 c/s.)
>>>
>>> Alternators for 600 c/s are feasible at a few kW in aircraft but they

--------------------------------------------------------^^^^^^^^

>>> are difficult to scale up to power station size.
>>
>> A modern large aircraft may have close to a megawatt of generation capacity.

------------------^^^^^^^^

> That seems too paltry.
> 
> .<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimitz-class_aircraft_carrier>

-----------------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> Propulsion is 190 Megawatts.  In earlier ships, this would be all
> steam and mechanical.
> 
> .<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_John_F._Kennedy_(CVN-79)>
> 
> Later ships are increasingly electric, to support modern things like
> big radars, electromagnetic launch systems, lasers, railguns, and so
> on.