| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<100bjbm$qcdu$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: OT, but given a certain someone's infatuation with Forced Reset Triggers... Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 03:15:02 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: <100bjbm$qcdu$1@dont-email.me> References: <Pine.NEB.4.64.2505172359010.26683@panix3.panix.com> <100bgac$pt27$1@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 05:15:02 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1ee667e6b2ff0337522808cbf783f3ba"; logging-data="864702"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BpY5DE38TBs5z8znIXCo2puo7ndepjfo=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:wWroO2x2ypBZ+x4qrntpjJaMsC8= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Bytes: 2332 BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote: >On May 17, 2025 at 5:00:24 PM PDT, "danny burstein" <dannyb@panix.com> wrote: > >> Subject: NY politocos inking up some new Asterisks >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> Date: 17 May 2025 13:28:22 -0400 >> From: New York Daily News <nydailynews@nws.nydailynews.com> >> Reply-To: noreply@email.tribpub.com >> Subject: N.Y. bill would outlaw sharing of online blueprints for machine gun >> conversion kits: DA Bragg >> >> N.Y. BILL WOULD OUTLAW SHARING OF ONLINE BLUEPRINTS FOR MACHINE GUN >> CONVERSION KITS: DA BRAGG >> >> Officials are working to clamp down on illegal guns by outlawing the >> sharing of digital blueprints that allow people to 3D print components >> that turn semi-automatic firearms into machine guns. > >(1) How is that not a bright-line violation of the 1st Amendment? It doesn't >meet any of the exceptions-- obscenity, etc.-- it's literally content-based >government censorship of speech which the Supreme Court has said is a no-no >for 200+ years. > >(2) How could they possibly enforce it? Living in California, I'm not subject >to New York's law, so if I put up a website with these digital files, they >can't do shit to me, but anyone from New York can access them if they want >to. Like China, all telecommunications out of state will be cut off. For the good of the people.