Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<100bjbm$qcdu$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: OT, but given a certain someone's infatuation with Forced Reset Triggers...
Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 03:15:02 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <100bjbm$qcdu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <Pine.NEB.4.64.2505172359010.26683@panix3.panix.com> <100bgac$pt27$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 05:15:02 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1ee667e6b2ff0337522808cbf783f3ba";
	logging-data="864702"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BpY5DE38TBs5z8znIXCo2puo7ndepjfo="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wWroO2x2ypBZ+x4qrntpjJaMsC8=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 2332

BTR1701  <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>On May 17, 2025 at 5:00:24 PM PDT, "danny burstein" <dannyb@panix.com> wrote:
>
>> Subject: NY politocos inking up some new Asterisks
>> 
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: 17 May 2025 13:28:22 -0400
>> From: New York Daily News <nydailynews@nws.nydailynews.com>
>> Reply-To: noreply@email.tribpub.com
>> Subject: N.Y. bill would outlaw sharing of online blueprints for machine gun
>>      conversion kits: DA Bragg
>> 
>> N.Y. BILL WOULD OUTLAW SHARING OF ONLINE BLUEPRINTS FOR MACHINE GUN
>> CONVERSION KITS: DA BRAGG
>> 
>> Officials are working to clamp down on illegal guns by outlawing the
>> sharing of digital blueprints that allow people to 3D print components
>> that turn semi-automatic firearms into machine guns.
>
>(1) How is that not a bright-line violation of the 1st Amendment? It doesn't
>meet any of the exceptions-- obscenity, etc.-- it's literally content-based
>government censorship of speech which the Supreme Court has said is a no-no
>for 200+ years.
>
>(2) How could they possibly enforce it? Living in California, I'm not subject
>to New York's law, so if I put up a website with these digital files, they
>can't do shit to me, but anyone from New York can access them if they want
>to.

Like China, all telecommunications out of state will be cut off. For the
good of the people.