Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Overcoming the proof of undecidability of the Halting Problem by
 a simple example in C
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 07:17:31 +0100
Organization: Fix this later
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <100eidr$1fofu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1005jsk$3akrk$1@dont-email.me>
 <bc6f0f045212bdfb7f7d883426873a09e37789ea@i2pn2.org>
 <1005u6v$3cpt2$1@dont-email.me> <1005v0p$3b07v$1@dont-email.me>
 <10063u0$3dmiv$1@dont-email.me> <1006on8$3l9t7$1@dont-email.me>
 <1007kgq$3qb7l$9@dont-email.me> <1009lm9$b15q$1@dont-email.me>
 <100ceum$uvq0$1@dont-email.me> <87ecwl1s2p.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <100dscu$18b5s$1@dont-email.me> <87v7pxzbp4.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <100du9m$18m8u$1@dont-email.me> <100dvuj$18b5q$2@dont-email.me>
 <100e17m$194d7$1@dont-email.me> <100e3qo$1d7a1$1@dont-email.me>
 <100e5g1$1do0r$1@dont-email.me> <100e7qg$1e5fs$1@dont-email.me>
 <100e9ns$1ee1a$1@dont-email.me> <100eb2m$1ejgp$1@dont-email.me>
 <100ebsj$1eo7p$1@dont-email.me> <100edn6$1eu82$1@dont-email.me>
 <100effa$1euvr$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 08:17:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="be58ce700b7a791d98bdef6cb205f490";
	logging-data="1565182"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18qS/STf8QEW2jvBDzNQ9diYKL2IT8PDiPXe1+l25jZ5w=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:R89DnXHcSlqjnMVof8zF5NdSGTo=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <100effa$1euvr$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3027

On 19/05/2025 06:27, olcott wrote:
> On 5/18/2025 11:57 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 19/05/2025 05:25, olcott wrote:
>>> On 5/18/2025 11:12 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>> On 19/05/2025 04:49, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ...a load of nonsense that didn't address my reply at all. I 
>>>> won't rebut it point by point because I have already dealt 
>>>> with all of his remarks, some of them several times over.
>>>>
>>>> < SNIP! >
>>>>
>>>> I'm beginning to wonder whether he ever learned to read for 
>>>> comprehension.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That you tried to get away with dodging my point
>>
>> I'm not dodging your point. I'm simply not interested in 
>> debating your point when it is already being so expertly 
>> debated by Mike Terry and 
> 
> Mike Terry's recent post

....is not an answer to my point, which you dodge and weave away 
from like a weavy dodgy thing.

If you do not wish to address my points (and clearly you don't), 
you can simply forgo a reply, rather than waste everyone's time 
by addressing some other point entirely.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within