Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<100esos$105b0$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: What is "uncertain" in quantum physics? Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:14:03 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: <100esos$105b0$1@dont-email.me> References: <100d5cr$105b1$1@dont-email.me> <100e0f3$18pob$2@dont-email.me> <100esco$105b1$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:14:14 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fcf06f9df370babaff46fa07453c23d2"; logging-data="1054048"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+RWUte1iyIkpw0Ju/uOaiy8ttWNJkFPWk=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:86WkzlUiIdmYbwn68u41MWzHs0Q= In-Reply-To: <100esco$105b1$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-GB, it On 19/05/2025 11:07, Julio Di Egidio wrote: > On 19/05/2025 03:10, x wrote: >> On 5/18/25 10:28, Julio Di Egidio wrote: >>> Why shouldn't we think of the Uncertainty Principle as just a statement >>> about the limits of observation, rather than about something objective, >>> especially as in causing some non-zero vacuum energy? >>> >>> Is there some experiment that settles "uncertainty" as something "really >>> there"? In particular, I am not sure if the expansion of the Universe >>> is such evidence, or rather a consequence of the theory. >>> >>> Thanks for any insight. >> >> Interesting. A statement or question actually >> about physics. > > LOL, indeed. > >> If something is 'quantized' in quantum mechanics >> it is actually there [and] not there. >> >> Take an electron. It actually has a specific >> rest mass or charge. It does not have an infinite >> number of fine degrees of mass or charge. > > But quantisation has nothing to do with uncertainty. > > Unless you are thinking of quantising space-time...? I.e. space-time dimensions: so no, at least not until further notice, as those remain in a first instance descriptions of observation, the "frames of reference". -Julio