Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<100esos$105b0$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: What is "uncertain" in quantum physics?
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:14:03 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <100esos$105b0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <100d5cr$105b1$1@dont-email.me> <100e0f3$18pob$2@dont-email.me>
 <100esco$105b1$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:14:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fcf06f9df370babaff46fa07453c23d2";
	logging-data="1054048"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+RWUte1iyIkpw0Ju/uOaiy8ttWNJkFPWk="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:86WkzlUiIdmYbwn68u41MWzHs0Q=
In-Reply-To: <100esco$105b1$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB, it

On 19/05/2025 11:07, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> On 19/05/2025 03:10, x wrote:
>> On 5/18/25 10:28, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>>> Why shouldn't we think of the Uncertainty Principle as just a statement
>>> about the limits of observation, rather than about something objective,
>>> especially as in causing some non-zero vacuum energy?
>>>
>>> Is there some experiment that settles "uncertainty" as something "really
>>> there"?  In particular, I am not sure if the expansion of the Universe
>>> is such evidence, or rather a consequence of the theory.
>>>
>>> Thanks for any insight.
>>
>> Interesting.  A statement or question actually
>> about physics.
> 
> LOL, indeed.
> 
>> If something is 'quantized' in quantum mechanics
>> it is actually there [and] not there.
>>
>> Take an electron.  It actually has a specific
>> rest mass or charge.  It does not have an infinite
>> number of fine degrees of mass or charge.
> 
> But quantisation has nothing to do with uncertainty.
> 
> Unless you are thinking of quantising space-time...?

I.e. space-time dimensions: so no, at least not until
further notice, as those remain in a first instance
descriptions of observation, the "frames of reference".

-Julio