Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<100hic6$25ta5$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Anybody Using IPv6?
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 10:35:02 +0100
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <100hic6$25ta5$3@dont-email.me>
References: <pan$e6d88$f019cb49$2e3cccf9$253bfbf1@linux.rocks>
 <m8s17vF4395U2@mid.individual.net> <100c243$c9t$1@reader1.panix.com>
 <UgKdndkx-vPPn7H1nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 11:35:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2dd12f66336441a04c2fd3ec74ebcb9c";
	logging-data="2291013"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX189QMqazpIhEPg2SEDWksN8A27J6k8MV/g="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GtlRojtx3drFVqA9IB0JduIL4Es=
In-Reply-To: <UgKdndkx-vPPn7H1nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2439

On 20/05/2025 05:17, c186282 wrote:
> On 5/18/25 3:26 AM, Popping Mad wrote:
>> On 5/17/25 2:01 PM, vallor wrote:
>>> IPv6 is the future.
>>
>>
>> fuck ip6
> 
>    We WILL need it, or something LIKE it, eventually
>    IOT, most of the world signing up ... IPV4 is NOT
>    gonna be enough.
> 
>    But for NOW ... yea ... I disable IPV6. My ISP
>    doesn't even do it, so why suffer the probs ?
> 
+1.
Its so radically different that I cant be arsed to go through a learning 
curve on something I don't need right now

>    Hmmm ... IPV5, with the usual dot notation ...
>    backwards-compatible intelligent ... that OUGHT
>    to cover it for a really long time. Maybe by
>    then we will have to bring space alien networks
>    into things, but perhaps they have the better
>    scheme eh ?
> 
>    "Backwards-compatible", in this case, means the
>    software/drivers automatically appending a ".000"
>    to detected IPV4 addresses without user intervention.

-- 
Labour - a bunch of rich people convincing poor people to vote for rich 
people by telling poor people that "other" rich people are the reason 
they are poor.

Peter Thompson