Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<100i5us$29du3$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 16:09:16 +0100 Organization: Fix this later Lines: 40 Message-ID: <100i5us$29du3$3@dont-email.me> References: <1005jsk$3akrk$1@dont-email.me> <bc6f0f045212bdfb7f7d883426873a09e37789ea@i2pn2.org> <1005u6v$3cpt2$1@dont-email.me> <1006oi9$3l93f$1@dont-email.me> <1007kan$3qb7l$8@dont-email.me> <1009n2d$b9ol$1@dont-email.me> <100ag73$g1r8$1@dont-email.me> <100c83u$tspg$1@dont-email.me> <100ctuc$121rs$1@dont-email.me> <100d5b7$13m1e$1@dont-email.me> <221167c1bbedbbda1934b12f6b2c72de2c3a1f78@i2pn2.org> <100dckr$1586e$1@dont-email.me> <c5c825970bebea6bd8bfde7077f7ffc5ba0c30f5@i2pn2.org> <100dedr$15dil$3@dont-email.me> <771e0f3f36c9914146f675bc9e2c1c0e7903c116@i2pn2.org> <100dfc8$15qbo$1@dont-email.me> <100f0m7$1in31$1@dont-email.me> <100h052$22oen$3@dont-email.me> <100ha34$24lfd$1@dont-email.me> <100i4cs$292ko$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 17:09:16 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3f6d60df11199315dcee71f6a818ac4e"; logging-data="2406339"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18U1C67Tom00AJ55taSABc51vM5NWca1xUp688b7gve9g==" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Rc2LA8HdSmYzfPIc+H+BNwebZMY= In-Reply-To: <100i4cs$292ko$3@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2868 On 20/05/2025 15:42, olcott wrote: > On 5/20/2025 2:13 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2025-05-20 04:24:02 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> On 5/19/2025 5:20 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>> On 2025-05-18 20:19:19 +0000, olcott said: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> You keep the strawman fallacy. >>>> >>>> A straw man fallacy is a (usually) correct refutation of >>>> something. >>> > > The strawman fallacy is stipulated to be incorrect > that is what the word "fallacy" means. Argument: The two shorter sides of a right angled triangle, when squared, sum to the square of the longer side. Strawman: Squares don't /have/ a longer side. The strawman is correct in what it claims. It is incorrect as a relevant rebuttal to the argument, which is about triangles, not squares. And you both KNOW this, for pity's sake! In the 70s, the teacher would have banged your heads together. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within