Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<100i5us$29du3$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser
 agreed to are exactly met
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 16:09:16 +0100
Organization: Fix this later
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <100i5us$29du3$3@dont-email.me>
References: <1005jsk$3akrk$1@dont-email.me>
 <bc6f0f045212bdfb7f7d883426873a09e37789ea@i2pn2.org>
 <1005u6v$3cpt2$1@dont-email.me> <1006oi9$3l93f$1@dont-email.me>
 <1007kan$3qb7l$8@dont-email.me> <1009n2d$b9ol$1@dont-email.me>
 <100ag73$g1r8$1@dont-email.me> <100c83u$tspg$1@dont-email.me>
 <100ctuc$121rs$1@dont-email.me> <100d5b7$13m1e$1@dont-email.me>
 <221167c1bbedbbda1934b12f6b2c72de2c3a1f78@i2pn2.org>
 <100dckr$1586e$1@dont-email.me>
 <c5c825970bebea6bd8bfde7077f7ffc5ba0c30f5@i2pn2.org>
 <100dedr$15dil$3@dont-email.me>
 <771e0f3f36c9914146f675bc9e2c1c0e7903c116@i2pn2.org>
 <100dfc8$15qbo$1@dont-email.me> <100f0m7$1in31$1@dont-email.me>
 <100h052$22oen$3@dont-email.me> <100ha34$24lfd$1@dont-email.me>
 <100i4cs$292ko$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 17:09:16 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3f6d60df11199315dcee71f6a818ac4e";
	logging-data="2406339"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18U1C67Tom00AJ55taSABc51vM5NWca1xUp688b7gve9g=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Rc2LA8HdSmYzfPIc+H+BNwebZMY=
In-Reply-To: <100i4cs$292ko$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2868

On 20/05/2025 15:42, olcott wrote:
> On 5/20/2025 2:13 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2025-05-20 04:24:02 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>> On 5/19/2025 5:20 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2025-05-18 20:19:19 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You keep the strawman fallacy.
>>>>
>>>> A straw man fallacy is a (usually) correct refutation of 
>>>> something.
>>>
> 
> The strawman fallacy is stipulated to be incorrect
> that is what the word "fallacy" means.

Argument:

The two shorter sides of a right angled triangle, when squared, 
sum to the square of the longer side.

Strawman:

Squares don't /have/ a longer side.

The strawman is correct in what it claims. It is incorrect as a 
relevant rebuttal to the argument, which is about triangles, not 
squares.

And you both KNOW this, for pity's sake!

In the 70s, the teacher would have banged your heads together.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within