Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Mike Terry Proves --- How the requirements that Professor Sipser
 agreed to are exactly met
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 10:30:46 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <100i776$2a4c8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1005jsk$3akrk$1@dont-email.me>
 <bc6f0f045212bdfb7f7d883426873a09e37789ea@i2pn2.org>
 <1005u6v$3cpt2$1@dont-email.me> <1006oi9$3l93f$1@dont-email.me>
 <1007kan$3qb7l$8@dont-email.me> <1009n2d$b9ol$1@dont-email.me>
 <100ag73$g1r8$1@dont-email.me> <100c83u$tspg$1@dont-email.me>
 <100ctuc$121rs$1@dont-email.me> <100d5b7$13m1e$1@dont-email.me>
 <221167c1bbedbbda1934b12f6b2c72de2c3a1f78@i2pn2.org>
 <100dckr$1586e$1@dont-email.me>
 <c5c825970bebea6bd8bfde7077f7ffc5ba0c30f5@i2pn2.org>
 <100dedr$15dil$3@dont-email.me>
 <771e0f3f36c9914146f675bc9e2c1c0e7903c116@i2pn2.org>
 <100dfc8$15qbo$1@dont-email.me> <100f0m7$1in31$1@dont-email.me>
 <100h052$22oen$3@dont-email.me> <100ha34$24lfd$1@dont-email.me>
 <100i4cs$292ko$3@dont-email.me> <100i5us$29du3$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 17:30:47 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7b186bbc1de8333ac6766257195eacc5";
	logging-data="2429320"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+F0Oxf/HsjYwDs0W2cK1jP"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XGjXzDk+RoinrxUF45R3r/OZt0I=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <100i5us$29du3$3@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250520-8, 5/20/2025), Outbound message

On 5/20/2025 10:09 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> On 20/05/2025 15:42, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/20/2025 2:13 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2025-05-20 04:24:02 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> On 5/19/2025 5:20 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-05-18 20:19:19 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You keep the strawman fallacy.
>>>>>
>>>>> A straw man fallacy is a (usually) correct refutation of something.
>>>>
>>
>> The strawman fallacy is stipulated to be incorrect
>> that is what the word "fallacy" means.
> 
> Argument:
> 
> The two shorter sides of a right angled triangle, when squared, sum to 
> the square of the longer side.
> 
> Strawman:
> 
> Squares don't /have/ a longer side.
> 
> The strawman is correct in what it claims. It is incorrect as a relevant 
> rebuttal to the argument, which is about triangles, not squares.
> 
> And you both KNOW this, for pity's sake!
> 
> In the 70s, the teacher would have banged your heads together.
> 

<MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
     If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its
     input D until H correctly determines that its simulated D
     would never stop running unless aborted then

I am ONLY taking about how HHH(DDD) meets the above criteria.
The ONLY rebuttal that anyone has (because they know that I am correct)
is to somehow distract attention away from the point that I am making.


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer