Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<100jdr5$mhq$1@reader1.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix3.panix.com!dannyb From: danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] Judge reams out people avoiding jury duty Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 02:29:57 -0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Message-ID: <100jdr5$mhq$1@reader1.panix.com> References: <100j7o7$c8fs$26@dont-email.me> <100java$2glu0$1@dont-email.me> <100jdfb$2krk5$1@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 02:29:57 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix3.panix.com:166.84.1.3"; logging-data="23098"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" User-Agent: nn/6.7.3 Bytes: 1781 Lines: 24 In <100jdfb$2krk5$1@dont-email.me> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> writes: >BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote: >>>. . . >>When I finally returned home, I found a long-expired summons for jury duty in >>my accumulated mail. I called the number on the summons and explained what had >>happened. The woman looked up the number on my summons and said it was no >>problem, they'd just cancel it in the system and issue a new summons for me >>since I was home now and being retired had no work conflicts with serving. And >>a few days later, a new summons showed up. I went and got eliminated the >>moment both sides discovered I was a lawyer. >Wouldn't stating that you intend to apply common sense after listening >to arguments have disqualified you as well? "I'm a firm beliver in Jury Nullification" -- _____________________________________________________ Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key dannyb@panix.com [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]