Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: x <x@x.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: What is "uncertain" in quantum physics?
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 20:23:07 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <100jgur$2ldn1$1@dont-email.me>
References: <100d5cr$105b1$1@dont-email.me>
 <6e300872fb3df19ad9c3f95d746590fd@www.novabbs.org>
 <100hj0d$261bc$2@dont-email.me>
 <c4b1148b4b135af592659061cb310f31@www.novabbs.org>
 <100i1l7$28brh$1@dont-email.me>
 <00f4d7db30dfd71f3d2c92911f15015b@www.novabbs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 05:23:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="364695e503a5fb1b32266bba22459a38";
	logging-data="2799329"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX190cgaKwgiKviRKUvZ83eEBfoTQtbx6kP0="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZCLvaG4SCLw4yDwjvWlQ3fXMmRo=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <00f4d7db30dfd71f3d2c92911f15015b@www.novabbs.org>
Bytes: 3592

On 5/20/25 16:08, Bertitaylor wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2025 13:55:51 +0000, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> 
>> On 20/05/2025 13:22, Bertitaylor wrote:
>>> On Tue, 20 May 2025 9:45:49 +0000, x wrote:
>>>> On 5/20/25 00:41, Bertitaylor wrote:
>>>>> Why do you think the universe expands?
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure about that thought experiment concerning
>>>> an infinitely old universe having the background of space
>>>> gradually filling with stars if there was an infinite
>>>> distance or time to look upon it.
>>>
>>> Idea is that the universe always was and always will be, of infinite
>>> size. This goes against Genesis so idea is automatically outed by
>>> Abrahamic minds to the corruption of science by wrong physics
>>>>
>>>> It seems feasible that the integral could add up to
>>>> near zero as well as stars everywhere.
>>>
>>> Near zero density of the universe is not zero density, but enough to put
>>> the show on constant motion.
>>
>> That makes a lot sense, especially more sense than the
>> circularity of reasoning that I am finding all over the place.
>>
>>>> Anyway the Doppler effect is different from the photoelectric
>>>> effect.
>>>
>>> Doppler effect shows half the galaxies are going away and half coming
>>> towards us. Redshift, blueshift both happening. No edge found of the
>>> universe. Only more galaxies.
>>
>> Indeed, also the problem of what evidence for what tampering.
>> If nothing, it's embarrassing...
>>
>> -Julio
> 
> Good, Arindam's physics throws out all confusion. It unites all forces
> as electric; updates the laws of motion and chucks out the theories of
> relativity and quantum.
> 
> You can easily get the relevant links from searching in this newsgroup.

You know with classic static electricity, a lot of positive charges
like 'protons' would repel each other in a nucleus.

You might need a 'strong force' to keep them in the nucleus regardless
of the quantum nature of this 'strong force'.

Then there might be neutrons and positrons or electrons.  It might be
that the nature of the 'weak force' might not be as obvious as the
'strong force'.  It does seem feasible however that the 'strong force'
might be different from static electricity.  Positive charges do repel
each other.