Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: x <x@x.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: What is "uncertain" in quantum physics?
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 20:57:14 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <100jiuq$2ldn1$2@dont-email.me>
References: <100d5cr$105b1$1@dont-email.me>
 <0001HW.2DDBAB6A0079A85A7000018E038F@news.eternal-september.org>
 <100ip67$2dmd4$1@dont-email.me> <t7ivfl-ic1l.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 05:57:15 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="364695e503a5fb1b32266bba22459a38";
	logging-data="2799329"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18xOYu4lVhpGBhClg30yW4XzQwjGf8XI0g="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xQvXj9HhS+WTb0BNxwOnDgwQF64=
In-Reply-To: <t7ivfl-ic1l.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3142

On 5/20/25 17:10, Jim Pennino wrote:
> x <x@x.org> wrote:
>> On 5/19/25 11:09, David Dalton wrote:
>>> On May 18, 2025, Julio Di Egidio wrote
>>> (in article <100d5cr$105b1$1@dont-email.me>):
>>>
>>>> Why shouldn't we think of the Uncertainty Principle as just a statement
>>>> about the limits of observation, rather than about something objective,
>>>> especially as in causing some non-zero vacuum energy?
>>>>
>>>> Is there some experiment that settles "uncertainty" as something "really
>>>> there"? In particular, I am not sure if the expansion of the Universe
>>>> is such evidence, or rather a consequence of the theory.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for any insight.
>>>>
>>>> -Julio
>>>
>>> You might want to try posting to the moderated group
>>> sci.physics.research , which has some knowledgeable
>>> readers.
>>
>> You know there is a lot to be said against censorship,
>> but when it comes to how it is easier for people to just
>> make stuff up rather than find out the truth (like no
>> red shift of galaxies) then I guess I could look (maybe
>> it is impossible to post there).
>>
>> Basic question, is there some way to tell whether a
>> usenet group is moderated or not moderated?
> 
> https://www.harley.com/usenet/master-list/index.html
> 
> Search for "physics moderated".

Thank you.  I found one part of the topology of the
site that showed something like 'copyright 2025'
rather than 10 or 20 years ago.

A lot of people are attracted to the bells and
whistles of the other sites and do not notice
or care about the censored part.  They might
be able to sign up to post and read or maybe not.

I guess usenet is older than the world wide web
or internet.

It seems to me like it is used less than it
did 10 or 20 years ago.  It is very ancient.

>>
>> Something like 'sci.physics.research' does not seem
>> to say much to me like 'I am a moderated usenet group'.
>>
>>
>>
>