| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<100kr28$2sf5j$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Anybody Using IPv6? Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 08:21:44 -0700 Organization: dis Lines: 38 Message-ID: <100kr28$2sf5j$2@dont-email.me> References: <pan$e6d88$f019cb49$2e3cccf9$253bfbf1@linux.rocks> <m8s17vF4395U2@mid.individual.net> <100c243$c9t$1@reader1.panix.com> <100hcol$3nsd6$1@news1.tnib.de> <100hiha$25ta5$4@dont-email.me> <OpycnTuZzd5U1rD1nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <100jqbn$4nh8$1@news1.tnib.de> Reply-To: blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 17:21:45 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="27c2a3280932f2c967ddcbdfd83ba4ca"; logging-data="3030195"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18yYr4JtvWaX+Csa1KXQCs2" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ypWyoiAMQuas1/H0uZs0ZvoJ/rA= In-Reply-To: <100jqbn$4nh8$1@news1.tnib.de> Content-Language: en-US On 5/20/25 23:03, Marc Haber wrote: > c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote: >> IPV4 = unexpectedly proved a bit inadequate > > totally inadequate. > >> IPV6 = horrible overkill 'solution' > > I violently disagree. > > It is IPv4 that needs overkill 'solutions' to be kept alive. > >> IPV5 ... my proposal ... maybe the best and >> most transparent. Good for the next 50 years >> fer-sure. > > Horrible. > >> These are numbers HUMANS can read, remember, understand. > > IP Adresses were never meant to be remembered or understood. > >> Don't know WHERE the IPV6 stuff was coming from - TOO tech >> IMHO. > > It is a sane, nicely designed, simple protocol with a lot of > flexibility that needs less worarounds that IPv4 does. > IVP6 comes from having too many web sites to fit in IVP4. If you pay attention to the larger picture you might know that. That the protocol has not been properly instituted everywhere it should have been is not the fault of the designers but of people who learned IVP4 and think nothing better can come along. bliss