| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<100l9lo$30eb4$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2025-05-15 (Thursday) Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 15:31:04 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: <100l9lo$30eb4$3@dont-email.me> References: <UBI20250515@dont-email.me> <1007c47$3oo0f$1@dont-email.me> <1007eqb$nsf5$1@solani.org> <1007ptp$3rhlu$1@dont-email.me> <1153788526.769108049.058667.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <100f3f1$1j4jl$2@dont-email.me> <2052610206.769439662.108459.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <100ilh6$2d1g2$1@dont-email.me> <97589226.769464990.529762.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <100kdmo$2q5uq$5@dont-email.me> <1190766612.769544424.097029.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> Injection-Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 21:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="66938f6bee70ecc4fcf9bdcaa6cae0ba"; logging-data="3160420"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/YNi/RwAwCQIe+sMcqVTDqcfyJm76u2f0=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:RoANq/X+4qsKxzGox+12nkbl7vs= X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit) Bytes: 2440 anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote: >Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote: >> anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote: >>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote: >>>> anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote: >>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote: >>>>>> anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote: >>>>>>> Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> Sherlock and Daughter - "For Kith and Kin" - Mostly background >>>>>>>> noise. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is wrong with this show that it's so incredibly uninvolving? >>>>>> >>>>>> My guess would be "Sherlock Holmes" fatigue. >>>>> >>>>> I don't think so. I watched the Sherlock Holmes movie with the >>>>> submarine (private life?) within the last month or two and had no >>>>> problem paying attention to it. >>>> >>>> It seems like every couple years, someone makes some variant of Sherlock >>>> Holmes, the latest with Holmes being an oriental woman. >>> >>> I've not heard of that one >> >> Miss Sherlock, >> Elementary > >The Oriental woman in elementary was Watson not Sherlock I did not know that, judging by the commericls and promos. -- Not a joke! Don't jump!