Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<100liu3$322u6$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Anybody Using IPv6?
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 23:09:07 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <100liu3$322u6$1@dont-email.me>
References: <pan$e6d88$f019cb49$2e3cccf9$253bfbf1@linux.rocks>
	<m8s17vF4395U2@mid.individual.net> <100c243$c9t$1@reader1.panix.com>
	<100hcol$3nsd6$1@news1.tnib.de> <100hiha$25ta5$4@dont-email.me>
	<OpycnTuZzd5U1rD1nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
	<100jqbn$4nh8$1@news1.tnib.de> <100kr28$2sf5j$2@dont-email.me>
	<100l8kn$80aq$1@news1.tnib.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 00:09:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="546a358aad7e984f931cff2fda2c1143";
	logging-data="3214278"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/bIDW7Q6+Y+UV0aNy10IwQ"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Wp7DquKaEfDDBdpgK/mg6c7wQiY=

On 2025-05-21, Marc Haber wrote:

> Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>	IVP6 comes from having too many web sites to fit in IVP4.
>
> No. THAT issue has been solved with name-based virtual hosting and
> SNI. Which is too bad since it decreases the pressure to get rid of
> v4.

Here the IPv4 problem is not websites, but hosts/nodes/devices. IPv4
only survives because of NAT.

IPv6 seems to make it quite easy to get non-local addresses. At least
when properly deployed.

>>If you pay attention to the larger picture you might know that. That
>>the protocol has not been properly instituted everywhere it should
>>have been is not the fault of the designers but of people who learned
>>IVP4 and think nothing better can come along.
>
> And it is the fault of the persons who are SO acquainted with the
> crutches that v4 needs to limp ahead that they actually think that a
> protocol that doesn't need THESE¹ crutches is crippled.
>
> Greetings
> Marc
>
> ¹ I am not saying that IPv6 is the best protocol ever but it's the
> best we've got at the moment.

What would be a good description/introduction/... in textual form of
IPv6 to introduce people to the way it's intended to be used? Stuff like
mentioning address scopes, RAs, DHCP, multicast...

-- 
Nuno Silva