Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Analysis of Richard Damon's Responses to Flibble's Detection Argument
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 11:06:08 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <100mltg$3c9aa$1@dont-email.me>
References: <YAoXP.1292871$4AM6.652919@fx17.ams4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 10:06:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="964861fa1740bc5380420e7de708c232";
	logging-data="3548490"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/dBigEMDM681eb8VutICTV"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OFD425t0xAUrK2smiOtzg3O/APY=
Bytes: 1306

On 2025-05-21 18:04:40 +0000, Mr Flibble said:

> Thus, Damon’s critiques:
> - Are not wrong *in themselves*,
> - But are irrelevant when applied to a model that redefines the semantic
> rules of the game.

Redefinition of the semantic rules of the game makes everthing Flibble
says irrelevant to the halting problem and other topics of con.theory.

-- 
Mikko