| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<100n9be$2s$1@panix2.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!.POSTED.2602:f977:0:1::2!not-for-mail From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) Newsgroups: comp.misc,nz.general,aus.computers Subject: Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 09:37:50 -0400 (EDT) Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) Message-ID: <100n9be$2s$1@panix2.panix.com> References: <10044na$30sk8$1@dont-email.me> <100ao1q.t98.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <100am2l$3la$1@panix2.panix.com> <100b86k$kn2g$3@dont-email.me> Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="2602:f977:0:1::2"; logging-data="27552"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >On Sat, 17 May 2025 14:55:17 -0400 (EDT), Scott Dorsey wrote: > >> The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ... > >Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't they? Not just right-wingers. Plenty of folks left and center have social objections to that. (Most of the claimed religious objections on the right turn out to be social objections when carefully inspected.) We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't going to change until people see places that are less so. The nice thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see places that are less so. The bad thing about the internet is that it provides no context. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."