Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<100n9be$2s$1@panix2.panix.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!.POSTED.2602:f977:0:1::2!not-for-mail
From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups: comp.misc,nz.general,aus.computers
Subject: Re: Banning Social Media For Under-16s
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 09:37:50 -0400 (EDT)
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Message-ID: <100n9be$2s$1@panix2.panix.com>
References: <10044na$30sk8$1@dont-email.me> <100ao1q.t98.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <100am2l$3la$1@panix2.panix.com> <100b86k$kn2g$3@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="2602:f977:0:1::2";
	logging-data="27552"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"

Lawrence D'Oliveiro  <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>On Sat, 17 May 2025 14:55:17 -0400 (EDT), Scott Dorsey wrote:
>
>> The only solution is to actually educate kids about sex ...
>
>Some right-wingers have religious objections to that though, don't they?

Not just right-wingers.  Plenty of folks left and center have social
objections to that.  (Most of the claimed religious objections on the
right turn out to be social objections when carefully inspected.)

We live in a society that is very messed-up about sex and that isn't
going to change until people see places that are less so.  The nice
thing about the internet is that it gives kids an opportunity to see
places that are less so.  The bad thing about the internet is that it
provides no context.
--scott
-- 
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."