Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Gas-Powered Vehicles Saved in California
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 07:23:29 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <100q0d0$47hc$2@dont-email.me>
References: <100o2kr$3lcpu$1@dont-email.me> <100o91r$3k88m$10@dont-email.me>
 <100oli5$3oppn$3@dont-email.me> <100onfl$3otbn$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 16:23:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="953804f406e64d07047943eb681afffa";
	logging-data="138796"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18FmckK6+XNYJSz+WfZSD+5"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IHwp/DwZpSk5/4XbkMv1o7hDCT4=
In-Reply-To: <100onfl$3otbn$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US

On 5/22/2025 7:45 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> May 22, 2025 at 3:38:50 PM PDT, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>:
>>> 2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> 
>>>> Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
>>>> them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal
>>>> government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on
>>>> gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have
>>>> no idea on what basis he plans to sue.  "California has a right, alone
>>>> among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't
>>>> sound like a winning case to me.
> 
>>> I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a
>>> real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal
>>> Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing
>>> the head clown....
> 
>> The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items like the one
>> above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the
>> implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew he
>> would do this.
> 
>> In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for it
>> again." Drives them nuts.
> 
> Trump just got US credit downgraded, which means even higher interest on
> the national debt. Plus, at his urging, Congress will add $3.8 trillion
> to the national debt. Plus, Trump's trade insanity is about to trigger a
> worldwide recession.
> 
> Did Trump voters vote for that?

They voted for the things the Trump Party did that caused all that.

-- 
I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky 
dirty old man.