Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Analysis_of_Flibble=E2=80=99s_Latest=3A_Detecting_v?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?s=2E_Simulating_Infinite_Recursion_ZFC?=
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 23:06:16 +0100
Organization: Fix this later
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <100qrgo$9mjb$1@dont-email.me>
References: <Ms4XP.801347$BFJ.668081@fx13.ams4>
 <95db078e80b2868ed15a9a9a2af0280d96234a3a@i2pn2.org>
 <100jo18$2mhfd$1@dont-email.me> <100jpv9$2m0ln$4@dont-email.me>
 <100kt0c$2tae8$3@dont-email.me> <100ktr7$2reaa$1@dont-email.me>
 <100l09v$2tae8$5@dont-email.me> <100l1ov$2ul3j$1@dont-email.me>
 <100l3jh$2v0e9$1@dont-email.me> <100l5c8$2ul3j$2@dont-email.me>
 <100l75g$2vpq3$1@dont-email.me> <100l887$2ul3i$2@dont-email.me>
 <100l9gh$30aak$1@dont-email.me> <100lc4o$30pgm$1@dont-email.me>
 <100ld1u$312c9$1@dont-email.me> <100lg4g$31jt3$1@dont-email.me>
 <100lkdv$32ib3$1@dont-email.me> <100lmif$32v06$1@dont-email.me>
 <100lmp3$32ven$1@dont-email.me>
 <9af78257f75aa43a76d4b75e226bf92aeaf62463@i2pn2.org>
 <100ngbr$3hg1k$1@dont-email.me> <100p7gf$3voas$2@dont-email.me>
 <100q8cq$5buc$8@dont-email.me>
 <6bd30be886d32bf94f526d777e8ee5a9231cd43d@i2pn2.org>
 <100qlhs$8jis$1@dont-email.me> <100qn3h$7shk$3@dont-email.me>
 <100qo0e$918i$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 00:06:17 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="46af839bba36107f8c031579a0525255";
	logging-data="318059"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Dca3Fv75TrYF5sanQQDCwNNmFIkrDdaOlakrLBQMCjw=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HqUHv8g0bEa8tcLq8fdY0KdbnWY=
In-Reply-To: <100qo0e$918i$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB

On 23/05/2025 22:06, olcott wrote:
> On 5/23/2025 3:50 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 23/05/2025 21:24, olcott wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> Liar
>>
>> An unequivocal response, but it lacks persuasive power.
>>
> 
> When I provide the exact detailed steps of exactly how
> people can show that I am wrong and they refuse to
> show that I am wrong yet claim that I am wrong this
> is the kind of reckless disregard for the truth that
> loses defamation cases.

When your opponents point to the Turing proof that proves you're 
wrong that's exactly the kind of reckful regard for the truth 
that wins defamation cases.

Be careful who you sue.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within