Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<100sb5g$mb37$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-11,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: My week with Linux: I'm dumping Windows for Ubuntu to see how it
 goes
Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 21:39:25 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 99
Message-ID: <100sb5g$mb37$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1008i5i$f02$2@dont-email.me> <m8sl0dF562eU1@mid.individual.net>
 <100b891$kn2g$4@dont-email.me> <m8spnbF562eU2@mid.individual.net>
 <100bor2$r9u4$1@dont-email.me> <100bvqu$sehg$2@dont-email.me>
 <100cqr2$2qqb$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <m8uq9nFin9lU1@mid.individual.net>
 <100drik$cac$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <m8vcvqFllf4U1@mid.individual.net>
 <100envm$1uh9$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <100eo5v$1gu86$1@dont-email.me>
 <100fmsr$1tn9$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <100ghbi$1sbnn$7@dont-email.me>
 <100h2ei$20iu$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lZ_WP.16948$oFZb.11160@fx06.iad>
 <100ipqb$1q4f$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <Gz8XP.776527$ujgb.430349@fx15.iad>
 <100jm2k$in1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <100l3g1$2v1et$1@dont-email.me>
 <100ljkh$1vj9$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <100p54l$3v9a7$1@dont-email.me> <qWZXP.103132$MKx.20172@fx13.iad>
 <m9bbveFht4qU1@mid.individual.net> <Do%XP.67223$hqs3.59917@fx11.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 13:39:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5e1af8b81066a3312e18bfa4a38e686b";
	logging-data="732263"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/v/2Y9Qx9thcDR8IkzVzAJ"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kh8FczGK9aykr2qm7TyWJFgvvu4=
In-Reply-To: <Do%XP.67223$hqs3.59917@fx11.iad>
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 250524-0, 5/24/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 6271

On 24/05/2025 12:13 am, CrudeSausage wrote:
> On 2025-05-23 09:36, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>> On 2025-05-23 14:33, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>> On 2025-05-23 02:38, Chris wrote:
>>>> Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 21 May 2025 17:45:38 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I studied the coronaviruses way back in the sixties and 
>>>>>>> seventies. They haven't changed since then. There are 
>>>>>>> only 7 known to infect man.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Lol. "Studied". At least three new species have been 
>>>>>> identified in the last 20 years or so. SARS-CoV-1, MERS
>>>>>> and SARS-CoV-2 which cause significant and deadly disease
>>>>>> in humans. That's an important change.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Chris,
>>>>> 
>>>>> My point was that the coronaviridea were and are well known 
>>>>> to science, well before the general public heard about them 
>>>>> only recently.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Again, everything people know is wrong if they think they're 
>>>>> new.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I forgot more about coronaviruses than you will ever know,
>>>>> so be careful when you ridicule scientific statements simply 
>>>>> because you don't like them.
>>>> 
>>>> Get over yourself. You think reading books is equivalent to 
>>>> obtaining a degree. You wouldn't know a scientific statement
>>>> if it smacked you around the chops.
>>>> 
>>>>> What stands SARS-COV-2 apart (other than the multiple 
>>>>> attachment sites) is the specificities of the resulting 
>>>>> cytokine storm - which isn't well known why it hits certain 
>>>>> people so hard. But what's a fact is comorbidities are over 
>>>>> the 90% mark - so it usually isn't Covid alone that kills 
>>>>> people.
>>>>> 
>>>>> At my age, perhaps being twice that of yours,
>>>> 
>>>> Nope.
>>>> 
>>>>> the risks are high enough that boosters are still
>>>>> recommended but they're not going to be recommended for
>>>>> people under about the age of 60 it seems, based on recent
>>>>> USA data.
>>>>> 
>>>>> However, since immunity is not long lasting (the average is 
>>>>> about 2 years even when people get the disease versus the 
>>>>> thing they call a vaccine), we're all destined to get Covid 
>>>>> about once every 2 years moving forward.
>>>> 
>>>> Not me. At least not to the point where my viral load is 
>>>> detectable. I tested almost daily during the pandemic and had
>>>> a case twice in the household. Never even a hint of being 
>>>> positive. Never had covid-19.
>>> 
>>> How would you even know? In most cases, COVID-19 was little more 
>>> than a flu. _Some_ people got seriously hurt by it, but most had 
>>> existing health troubles. Most people got seriously injured by 
>>> the "vaccine," not the virus.
>> 
>> LOL!  False, of course. And offtopic.

Certainly is!!

> Not false, not off-topic since you mentioned the "virus." I've had 
> several friends and family members injured by the "vaccine" you 
> Windows cretins were all too happy to promote. A good friend ended
> up with ovarian cancer, as did the wife of the guy I went to
> university with, as did my sister-in-law. Coincidence,

Yeap, that would be my guess .... as Women have been getting Ovarian
Cancer for years and years

and then along came COVID-19 and then came the Anti-Virial that probably
SAVED millions, world wide.

> or did it have anything to do with the fact that they all took a 
> double dose or more of the "vaccine" that has since been proven to
> be extremely damaging?

So THEY took double doses .... but it was the responsibility of the
Vaccine Companies. SURE it was!!

> Either you are ignorant and immune to data,

Or you ignore the many, many who were possibly saved.

> or you are being paid by the pharmaceutical companies to be
> willfully ignorant and encourage people to hurt themselves. Either
> way, Hell will be too good a place for you. I pray that everyone will
> be quick to dismiss every one of your statements as complete garbage
> and be quick to filter your opinions for the utter stupidity that
> they are.
-- 
Daniel70