Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<100t7el$a4l$3@reader1.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!.POSTED.www.mrbrklyn.com!not-for-mail From: Popping Mad <rainbow@colition.gov> Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology Subject: Re: Secondarily flightless (or partially terrestrial) pterosaurs? Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 15:42:00 -0400 Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Message-ID: <100t7el$a4l$3@reader1.panix.com> References: <c46928af-c74d-46e4-a1d3-ab4dc9a898ec@gmail.com> <JK-dndDbS9InloX1nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <53092f25-e6f5-446a-b445-fe4c25307800@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 19:42:13 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="www.mrbrklyn.com:96.57.23.83"; logging-data="10389"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <53092f25-e6f5-446a-b445-fe4c25307800@gmail.com> On 5/4/25 9:35 PM, erik simpson wrote: > I would love to know if Quetzalcoatylus could fly. It would almost have > to jump off a cliff to get airborne. I would actually want to know it if really existed. I am not certain the fossil record is solid enough to know that.