Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<100vrlj$1hntd$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Bad faith and dishonesty
Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:31 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <100vrlj$1hntd$1@dont-email.me>
References: <m99YP.725664$B6tf.610565@fx02.ams4>
 <100uct4$184ak$1@dont-email.me> <100v9ta$1d5lg$7@dont-email.me>
 <100ve61$1e53o$2@dont-email.me> <100vh47$1f7a8$1@dont-email.me>
 <100via6$1lno$1@news.muc.de> <100vo5n$1go1g$1@dont-email.me>
 <100vomn$1fqmu$1@dont-email.me> <100vpkf$1h90o$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 21:39:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fa2627016e39f0b5966c79d3de30c7ea";
	logging-data="1630125"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/nhnYqsZ79p6ywK60etlh+"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hjOZV+jBoUcbyDNMbf4nOc1pYQs=
In-Reply-To: <100vpkf$1h90o$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US

On 5/25/2025 3:04 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 5/25/2025 1:48 PM, dbush wrote:
>> On 5/25/2025 2:39 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 5/25/2025 11:59 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 5/25/2025 10:49 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>> Op 25.mei.2025 om 16:36 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>> On 5/25/2025 1:21 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025-05-24 01:20:18 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So much bad faith and dishonesty shown in this forum that 
>>>>>>>>> myself and
>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>> Olcott have to fight against.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Everything here seems to be dishonesty and protests against 
>>>>>>>> dishonesty.
>>>>>>>> If you could remove all dishonesty the protests woud stop, too, and
>>>>>>>> nothing would be left.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> _DDD()
>>>>>>> [00002192] 55             push ebp
>>>>>>> [00002193] 8bec           mov ebp,esp
>>>>>>> [00002195] 6892210000     push 00002192
>>>>>>> [0000219a] e833f4ffff     call 000015d2  // call HHH
>>>>>>> [0000219f] 83c404         add esp,+04
>>>>>>> [000021a2] 5d             pop ebp
>>>>>>> [000021a3] c3             ret
>>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3]
>>>>
>>>>>>> Then acknowledge that DDD simulated by HHH according
>>>>>>> to the rules of the x86 language cannot possibly reach
>>>>>>> its own "ret" instruction final halt state.
>>>>>> Why repeating this bug in HHH?
>>>>
>>>>> That everyone that understands these things
>>>>> sees that there is no bug ....
>>>>
>>>> That is untrue.  The bug is clear to anybody who understands C code.
>>>>
>>>
>>> OK then to prove that you are not a damned liar
>>> (you won't do this because you know that you are a liar)
>>> show how DDD simulated by HHH according to the rules
>>> of the x86 language 
>>
>> Which doesn't happen as you have admitted on the record:
>>
> 
> You Are the epitome of bad faith and dishonesty.

That I call you out on your lies and back it up with evidence is 
anything but.