| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<100vrlj$1hntd$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Bad faith and dishonesty Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 15:39:31 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 54 Message-ID: <100vrlj$1hntd$1@dont-email.me> References: <m99YP.725664$B6tf.610565@fx02.ams4> <100uct4$184ak$1@dont-email.me> <100v9ta$1d5lg$7@dont-email.me> <100ve61$1e53o$2@dont-email.me> <100vh47$1f7a8$1@dont-email.me> <100via6$1lno$1@news.muc.de> <100vo5n$1go1g$1@dont-email.me> <100vomn$1fqmu$1@dont-email.me> <100vpkf$1h90o$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 21:39:32 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fa2627016e39f0b5966c79d3de30c7ea"; logging-data="1630125"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/nhnYqsZ79p6ywK60etlh+" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:hjOZV+jBoUcbyDNMbf4nOc1pYQs= In-Reply-To: <100vpkf$1h90o$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US On 5/25/2025 3:04 PM, olcott wrote: > On 5/25/2025 1:48 PM, dbush wrote: >> On 5/25/2025 2:39 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 5/25/2025 11:59 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 5/25/2025 10:49 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>> Op 25.mei.2025 om 16:36 schreef olcott: >>>>>>> On 5/25/2025 1:21 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2025-05-24 01:20:18 +0000, Mr Flibble said: >>>> >>>>>>>>> So much bad faith and dishonesty shown in this forum that >>>>>>>>> myself and >>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>> Olcott have to fight against. >>>> >>>>>>>> Everything here seems to be dishonesty and protests against >>>>>>>> dishonesty. >>>>>>>> If you could remove all dishonesty the protests woud stop, too, and >>>>>>>> nothing would be left. >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> _DDD() >>>>>>> [00002192] 55 push ebp >>>>>>> [00002193] 8bec mov ebp,esp >>>>>>> [00002195] 6892210000 push 00002192 >>>>>>> [0000219a] e833f4ffff call 000015d2 // call HHH >>>>>>> [0000219f] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>>>>> [000021a2] 5d pop ebp >>>>>>> [000021a3] c3 ret >>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3] >>>> >>>>>>> Then acknowledge that DDD simulated by HHH according >>>>>>> to the rules of the x86 language cannot possibly reach >>>>>>> its own "ret" instruction final halt state. >>>>>> Why repeating this bug in HHH? >>>> >>>>> That everyone that understands these things >>>>> sees that there is no bug .... >>>> >>>> That is untrue. The bug is clear to anybody who understands C code. >>>> >>> >>> OK then to prove that you are not a damned liar >>> (you won't do this because you know that you are a liar) >>> show how DDD simulated by HHH according to the rules >>> of the x86 language >> >> Which doesn't happen as you have admitted on the record: >> > > You Are the epitome of bad faith and dishonesty. That I call you out on your lies and back it up with evidence is anything but.