| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1010frk$1lnub$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] Did you know that blacks built Stonehenge? Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 01:24:05 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 113 Message-ID: <1010frk$1lnub$1@dont-email.me> References: <100vc8j$1cpje$2@dont-email.me> <1010305$1j1vg$2@dont-email.me> <10105kc$1j59c$4@dont-email.me> <1010ej7$1j1vg$7@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 03:24:05 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9d18b686acd79bf3ed522a9d0a7f2ff1"; logging-data="1761227"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18d9QTCARg6oisDEBdFdZ4zK3a5SguFzUI=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:y/XT22r2Za+QIDH4H8TbZ57bcs0= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote: >On 2025-05-25 6:29 PM, moviePig wrote: >> On 5/25/2025 5:44 PM, Rhino wrote: >>> On 2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote: >>>> On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino" >>>>>>>> <no_offline_contact@example.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that >>>>>>>>> schoolchildren in >>>>>>>>> Britain are being taught these days, including the >>>>>>>>> preposterous lie that >>>>>>>>> blacks built Stonehenge. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to >>>>>>>> 'decolonize' academic curriculum. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could >>>>>>>> understand if >>>>>>>> they were protesting in India or some African country that was >>>>>>>> colonized by >>>>>>>> Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British >>>>>>>> colonies. >>>>>>>> But how >>>>>>>> do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in >>>>>>>> the first >>>>>>>> place. It's a logical oxymoron. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And how do they claim at the same time that: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (1) Historical Britons were black, and >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white >>>>>>>> people? >>>>>>>> They should be bitching about all those black Britons that >>>>>>>> stole the >>>>>>>> wealth of >>>>>>>> Africa. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat- >>>>>>> out lies. >>>>>>> As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that >>>>>>> kids are >>>>>>> NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually >>>>>>> believing >>>>>>> it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future >>>>>>> generation. There >>>>>>> will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as >>>>>>> fact >>>>>>> forever more. >>>>>> >>>>>> As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter >>>>>> of Truth. >>>>> >>>>> There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS. >>>> >>>> If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a >>>> *predominant* view of past events, then they could rationally reject >>>> any absurdities. But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are >>>> never sustainable. E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have >>>> documents, too... >>>> >>>> >>> Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many >>> people in that time and place were literate enough to create >>> documents? Did they even have a written language that long ago? And >>> that's assuming they had paper and ink to make records in the first >>> place. Or are you of the mind that they chiseled these records into >>> clay tablets? If so, do you have any reason to believe they knew how >>> to do that? >>> >>> Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of >>> black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation >>> by "activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going >>> back to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming to >>> have been a major part of things all the way along. >> >> I'm not disputing longstanding accounts of Stonehenge > >You're not? Then why did you suggest the possibility of documentary >evidence supporting the idea that Stonehenge was built by blacks at a >time and place when it was extremely unlikely that a written language >even existed, let alone the means to record that written language? > >> ...especially >> since the recent challenges do have a rather blatant p.c. aspect. I'm >> suggesting we should question our blithe acceptance of "history". > >I have no idea what you are saying. > >> Did >> you know that Texas classrooms are to display the Ten Commandments, >> justified because they're an historical part of our democracy? >> >> >Yes, I saw a headline to that effect. As far as the Ten Commandments >being part of history, that is obviously true. There's also a reasonable >argument that the Ten Commandments were a basic set of laws that >informed later laws like the ones governing our respective countries and >the state of Texas. You're apparently clutching your pearls at the >thought of them being on the wall. Why? Moses brought 15 commandments down from Mount Sinai.