Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: LTSpice model for a SiC MOSFET
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 00:55:58 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <1011vdv$223b4$2@dont-email.me>
References: <100c4og$t4lo$1@dont-email.me>
 <n7qj2kpht38kdk82o1hn10sss3ie2vnbrf@4ax.com> <100e4nq$1dhk3$1@dont-email.me>
 <tjam2klsvgahj9puk27mbs1f2q4sktcb9n@4ax.com>
 <5e2p2k9r7sd2o2o21llfen3nb881b4fuue@4ax.com> <100idtr$2at8a$5@dont-email.me>
 <eqf83kdolla6v8igg3rbk9829gkshgc41c@4ax.com>
 <9or83kt396omk0orhlbr2b77q8c7lbo2j3@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 16:56:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b92007d40085a6ab9ad45dbd69390aaf";
	logging-data="2166116"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1816B4quLJgCxIIojWNGWD6Wl0/3ax9mN0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8DpuGEwYP/TPVQTqZghwI0s8uYg=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250525-10, 26/5/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <9or83kt396omk0orhlbr2b77q8c7lbo2j3@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 3450

On 26/05/2025 11:44 pm, john larkin wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2025 11:17:05 +0100, Cursitor Doom
> <cd6699@notformail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 21 May 2025 03:25:11 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/05/2025 12:04 am, john larkin wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 19 May 2025 09:33:28 -0400, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The drain swing is actually 1.67 times the supply voltage, but it does
>>>>>> need two switching devices and a specially wound transformer (and we
>>>>>> know how reluctant you are to design them or get them made).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is probably going to be too expensive for the application, and we'd
>>>>>> be grateful for your insights into a cheaper alternative. I can't think
>>>>>> of one.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd keep it simple and repurpose a backwards commodity CCFL ($0.50)
>>>>> transformer, in a low frequency (20-50KHz) buck regulator 'of sorts'.
>>>>
>>>> A ccfl transformer is ideal for the HV step-down application, and dirt
>>>> cheap is a side benefit.
>>>>
>>>> They often have several windings, which helps build oscillators. More
>>>> details might involve using a search engine.
>>>
>>> It's not the sort of component that a search engine will find for you.
>>>
>>> A manufacturer and a part number would be helpful.
>> <...>
>>
>> Try asking Grok, Bill. Or else your preferred AI assistant. Works for
>> me.
> 
> He could strain his imagination to its limits and google
> 
>      ccfl transformer

Did it find anything for you?
> And then he could try designing electronics.

I've been doing that for some fifty years now, and have had some 
objectively verifiable successes, not that you are temperamentally 
equipped to appreciate other people's successes.

Try and find some other put-down. You might find one that works, 
eventually - that does seem to be how you find the "designs" (such as 
they are) that you post here.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney