Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Bad faith and dishonesty
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 10:29:01 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <10121bt$22da5$4@dont-email.me>
References: <m99YP.725664$B6tf.610565@fx02.ams4>
 <100uct4$184ak$1@dont-email.me> <100v9ta$1d5lg$7@dont-email.me>
 <1011eai$1urdm$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 17:29:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="64fd189e500b414701d6509a3265afae";
	logging-data="2176325"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX191W8TTMIVPJy+kEt7rEh4C"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ac7iW1V9HswAwDopxvcd3OruaoU=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250525-10, 5/25/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <1011eai$1urdm$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2724

On 5/26/2025 5:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2025-05-25 14:36:26 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 5/25/2025 1:21 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2025-05-24 01:20:18 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
>>>
>>>> So much bad faith and dishonesty shown in this forum that myself and 
>>>> Peter
>>>> Olcott have to fight against.
>>>
>>> Everything here seems to be dishonesty and protests against dishonesty.
>>> If you could remove all dishonesty the protests woud stop, too, and
>>> nothing would be left.
>>
>> _DDD()
>> [00002192] 55             push ebp
>> [00002193] 8bec           mov ebp,esp
>> [00002195] 6892210000     push 00002192
>> [0000219a] e833f4ffff     call 000015d2  // call HHH
>> [0000219f] 83c404         add esp,+04
>> [000021a2] 5d             pop ebp
>> [000021a3] c3             ret
>> Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3]
>>
>> Then acknowledge that DDD simulated by HHH according
>> to the rules of the x86 language cannot possibly reach
>> its own "ret" instruction final halt state.
> 
> I have never claimed that your HHH can simulate DDD to from the beginning
> to end.
> 

I am asking you to affirm that I am correct about this point.
DDD simulated by HHH according to the rules of the x86
language cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction
final halt state, thus is correctly rejected as non-halting.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer