| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<10121kg$22glp$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] Did you know that blacks built Stonehenge? Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 11:33:35 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 119 Message-ID: <10121kg$22glp$1@dont-email.me> References: <100vc8j$1cpje$2@dont-email.me> <100vntm$1ghan$3@dont-email.me> <100vs1a$1cpje$4@dont-email.me> <100vslt$1hsss$1@dont-email.me> <100vvtg$1ifur$4@dont-email.me> <101028p$1j59c$1@dont-email.me> <1010305$1j1vg$2@dont-email.me> <10105kc$1j59c$4@dont-email.me> <1010ej7$1j1vg$7@dont-email.me> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 17:33:37 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cba9685e834944d86f70ef6203c696ff"; logging-data="2179769"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/E+pvxybVpob+d9rXtTavlO5uPTz2eArM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:EPDE/uR9x04XSiHgdss5SnNu/nI= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <1010ej7$1j1vg$7@dont-email.me> Bytes: 6393 On 5/25/2025 9:02 PM, Rhino wrote: > On 2025-05-25 6:29 PM, moviePig wrote: >> On 5/25/2025 5:44 PM, Rhino wrote: >>> On 2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote: >>>> On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote: >>>>>>> On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino" >>>>>>>> <no_offline_contact@example.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that >>>>>>>>> schoolchildren in >>>>>>>>> Britain are being taught these days, including the >>>>>>>>> preposterous lie that >>>>>>>>> blacks built Stonehenge. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to >>>>>>>> 'decolonize' academic curriculum. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could >>>>>>>> understand if >>>>>>>> they were protesting in India or some African country that was >>>>>>>> colonized by >>>>>>>> Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British >>>>>>>> colonies. >>>>>>>> But how >>>>>>>> do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in >>>>>>>> the first >>>>>>>> place. It's a logical oxymoron. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And how do they claim at the same time that: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (1) Historical Britons were black, and >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white >>>>>>>> people? >>>>>>>> They should be bitching about all those black Britons that >>>>>>>> stole the >>>>>>>> wealth of >>>>>>>> Africa. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat- >>>>>>> out lies. >>>>>>> As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that >>>>>>> kids are >>>>>>> NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually >>>>>>> believing >>>>>>> it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future >>>>>>> generation. There >>>>>>> will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as >>>>>>> fact >>>>>>> forever more. >>>>>> >>>>>> As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute >>>>>> arbiter >>>>>> of Truth. >>>>> >>>>> There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', >>>>> FFS. >>>> >>>> If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a >>>> *predominant* view of past events, then they could rationally reject >>>> any absurdities. But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are >>>> never sustainable. E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have >>>> documents, too... >>>> >>>> >>> Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many >>> people in that time and place were literate enough to create >>> documents? Did they even have a written language that long ago? And >>> that's assuming they had paper and ink to make records in the first >>> place. Or are you of the mind that they chiseled these records into >>> clay tablets? If so, do you have any reason to believe they knew how >>> to do that? >>> >>> Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of >>> black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation >>> by "activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going >>> back to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming >>> to have been a major part of things all the way along. >> >> I'm not disputing longstanding accounts of Stonehenge > > You're not? Then why did you suggest the possibility of documentary > evidence supporting the idea that Stonehenge was built by blacks at a > time and place when it was extremely unlikely that a written language > even existed, let alone the means to record that written language? To show that a basis for discounting, e.g., "absurd history" is hard to articulate, and thus, to legislate. >> ...especially since the recent challenges do have a rather blatant >> p.c. aspect. I'm suggesting we should question our blithe acceptance >> of "history". > > I have no idea what you are saying. > >> Did you know that Texas classrooms are to display the Ten >> Commandments, justified because they're an historical part of our >> democracy? >> >> > Yes, I saw a headline to that effect. As far as the Ten Commandments > being part of history, that is obviously true. There's also a reasonable > argument that the Ten Commandments were a basic set of laws that > informed later laws like the ones governing our respective countries and > the state of Texas. You're apparently clutching your pearls at the > thought of them being on the wall. Why? Because it flouts "freedom from religion", and that scares some of us.