Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile,comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: The long-awaited EU battery-lifetime standards kick in on June 20, 2025
Date: 28 May 2025 14:41:52 GMT
Organization: NOYB
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <1017ec7.mlc.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References: <100tcf5$1i7g$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <1012kg2$26fdt$2@dont-email.me> <1012kn9$3qrm0$1@news.usenet.ovh> <m9lk4oF8shpU1@mid.individual.net> <1014m50$15v3$1@news.usenet.ovh> <1015174$2otaf$1@dont-email.me> <101521h$2n1p2$2@dont-email.me> <m9mm3iFeb9tU1@mid.individual.net> <10159fr$2q7aq$2@dont-email.me> <iKm*VUydA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
X-Trace: individual.net uWz1KfygF7IQwlsZHE8I0Az7lilAGGIYyqdV8/P12ypLwZK9xA
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jC6+axSZGEodiSl5e2G0DPufbaM= sha256:IJCIUCHGIecu20L0If1UQioRsdFVQyvCnOvLlSz+c/8=
User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Bytes: 2428

Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> In uk.telecom.mobile Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> > On 2025-05-27 13:37, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> > > On 2025-05-27 20:58, Alan wrote:
> > >> On 2025-05-27 11:44, Chris wrote:
> > >>> Hank <hankrobins@notspam.uk> wrote:
> > >>>> Carlos E. R. wrote to us on Tue, 27 May 2025 12:57:28 +0200:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On 2025-05-26 22:59, Hank wrote:
> > >>>>>> On 5/26/2025 10:55 PM, Alan wrote:
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> You're assuming that "Hank" is a distinct person from Arlen...
> > > 
> > > I don't know yet, but it is certainly possible. He appeared on March on 
> > > this Android group. All 4 posts from him supporting Arlen.
> > > 
> > 
> > Also, his "speech patterns" seem very familiar.
> > 
> > :-)
> 
> I think you can assume that any new poster who shows up out of the blue
> with...  a certain argumentative stance - is an Arlen sock.
> 
> The content doesn't change even if the name at the top does.

  'Hank' is still on my maybe-list, because he's still somewhat
restrained in this rather heated (non-)'debate'.

  But as soon as he starts insulting everybody, calling them idiots (and
worse), starts boasting, etc., he'll be number hundred and one.