Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Qualcomm_5G_Modem_Versus_Apple_C1_Modem_=E2=94=80_Q?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?ualcomm_Wins_on_Both_Speed_and_Thermals?=
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 14:27:11 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <1017v3f$3dae2$5@dont-email.me>
References: <1015e13$2rlbv$1@dont-email.me> <1015hdr$2q797$2@dont-email.me>
 <m9ongoFokf7U1@mid.individual.net>
 <1017bvu$261d$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 23:27:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7c8546323eb894c6a9c10f2885e82993";
	logging-data="3582402"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19IXXWoeBGc2c/OEaj1ZmORGUM12NiBGoM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PBht98ppamKU6ZQdMghcZfDDkp4=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <1017bvu$261d$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

On 2025-05-28 09:01, Marion wrote:
> On 28 May 2025 15:13:28 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote :
> 
> 
>>> 'A test run by Cellular Insights and PAID FOR BY Qualcomm'
>>
>> LOL
> 
> Given Apple has never made a best-in-class chip in their history,
> what makes these Apple trolls so confident to 'diss Qualcomm, who has?

All of Apple's "A" series chips are widely acknowledged as best-in-class.

> 
> a. Apple's C1 modem has no mmWave 5G
> b. Wi-Fi 6 Only (i.e., the C1 has no Wi-Fi 7)

And you demonstrate your ignorance again.

The C1 modem isn't responsible for WiFi connectivity at all...

....which is the same for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X75 5G it was tested 
against.

<https://www.qualcomm.com/products/technology/modems/snapdragon-x75-5g-modem-rf-system#blockdiagram>

> c. Fewer downlink carrier aggregation bands
> d. No Uplink Carrier Aggregation and Uplink MIMO
> e. Low performance under stress of urban environments
> f. Already has a baseband flaw
>     <https://cyberscoop.com/apple-security-update-c1-modem-privacy-fixes-may-2025/>
> 
> In summary, the way Apple's (rather brilliantly unapologetic) Marketing
> puts it, the Apple C1 can't do much, but it's efficient at doing nothing.
> 
> HINT: An Apple SOC with unpatchable flaws, is NOT best in class, no matter
> how desperate you Apple trolls are to claim Apple's SOCs are not garbage.

HINT: nothing you have referenced claims an "unpatchable flaw" in anything.

> 
> If you can find even a SINGLE Apple best-in-class chip, let us all know.
> We've been waiting for a loooooong time for Apple's design teams to do it.

Hey! Do you remember when you used to insist that Apple didn't actually 
do any design?

:-)