Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<10184g8$3fs81$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Fans Are COMPLETELY GIVING UP ON Doctor Who- Here's Why.
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 23:59:19 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 209
Message-ID: <10184g8$3fs81$2@dont-email.me>
References: <100knv3$2sb2s$4@dont-email.me> <xn0p63qcx5ao37t002@post.eweka.nl>
 <100nji5$3i7gi$1@dont-email.me> <100nl6t$3hrbb$3@dont-email.me>
 <100o5vc$vtq$10@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 <94d32dcc82b8777659b290f5d1813803@www.novabbs.com>
 <100qc0v$6a6d$3@dont-email.me> <xn0p65e425palwa006@post.eweka.nl>
 <100qqp5$9hqk$2@dont-email.me> <xn0p66cwm7wl6ye002@post.eweka.nl>
 <100t5ps$rmro$1@dont-email.me> <xn0p67wn89j2xkl000@post.eweka.nl>
 <1012rbl$27ph7$1@dont-email.me> <xn0p6apvsce3xy7000@post.eweka.nl>
 <101719k$38ffm$2@dont-email.me> <xn0p6c7xidyaqbm000@post.eweka.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 00:59:20 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a2cdcdc6cc6640085994a6928c1be256";
	logging-data="3666177"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18PhRvOV41e/ph0o9kOLs7IouCnz+rBIdo="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FAieHZqnUM6m7LGWlInlC3cYEdQ=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <xn0p6c7xidyaqbm000@post.eweka.nl>
Bytes: 9919

On 28/05/2025 16:22, Blueshirt wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote:
> 
>> On 27/05/2025 13:31, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> People in the real world who I speak to agree with me. The
>>>> overwhelming majority have had enough of wokery. Why do you
>>>> think Reform is leading in the polls and Nigel Farage is
>>>> the most popular leader? Why do you think they won control
>>>> of 10 local authorities?
>>>
>>> Is RADW not people from the real world?
>>
>> RADW is about discussion of Doctor Who not the real world.
> 
> That's funny, as you seem to always be bringing real world
> issues here. Every post you make on RADW is based on your
> political "anti-woke" agenda.

I am not the one bringing in woke, race, gender and identity politics 
into Doctor Who which has absolutely nothing to do with what the show is 
supposed to be about. If disgusting woke propaganda is propagated 
through the hijacking of TV shows and literature and the re-writing of 
history to fit in with the woke false narrative which they use as a 
cover for sexually grooming children then I have every right to denounce it.

> 
> When was the last time you discussed an episode of Doctor Who
> here properly? All we get is an anti-everything, pro-nothing
> manifesto.
Doctor Who ended in 2017.

> 
> But the people on RADW are real people and their opinions are
> equally as valid as yours.

The opinions of those brainwashed with woke propaganda are not valid 
opinions unless they can defend them. The woke cannot defend any of 
their ideology whatsoever. That's why the woke want to cancel and 
silence anyone who thinks differently.

Given that 97% of the audience of Doctor Who is heterosexual explain why 
a heterosexual adult would be interested in being lectured to in every 
episode about homosexuality. This propaganda isn't for the consumption 
of adults it's for the consumption of children.

Why when 70% of the audience of Doctor Who is male would they be 
interested in having the main protagonist being turned into a women and 
being used to constantly attack men and masculinity?

There was never any racism, sexism, or homophobia in Doctor Who so why 
is the audience being constantly being called racists, sexists, and 
bigots by the perverted woke soap opera writers that have taken it over?

It's these degenerate soap opera writers who are using Doctor Who to 
spread racism, sexism, and bigotry to the audience because soap opera, 
the genera that these degenerate hacks write is deliberately written in 
a manner to create inter-personal conflict between the characters using 
race, gender, and sexuality as its basis. Why don't this disgusting 
perverts go back to writing soap opera and attack the people who watch 
it instead of attacking people who never racists, sexist, or homophobic 
to begin with?

Inter-personal conflict has never been part of Science Fiction. The 
conflict in Science Fiction has always been between discussing different 
scientific and technological ideas and social structures and whether 
they can be used for good or evil.

> 
>>>> You are the one who is whacko. Real ordinary people think
>>>> the woke are totally insane and are controlled by child
>>>> groomers.
>>>
>>> It's possible that a lot of people in the real world think
>>> "the woke" are insane, but I don't think many of them think
>>> they are controlled by "child groomers".
>>
>> Have you watched season 4 of The Boys? As demonstrated by the
>> allegorical story-line which is based on wokery and
>> hypocritical woke virtue-signalling in the Entertainment
>> industry it is made abundantly clear that the woke are
>> explicitly viewed by the majority of people as I quote,
>> "pedophiles".
> 
> I haven't watched it... you watch it so I don't have to!
> 
>>>>> How many people in the real world say Doctor Who is
>>>>> produced to sexually groom children? How many people
>>>>> here think that's the
>>>>
>>>> The overwhelming majority. More than 70%.
>>>
>>> Nope, not having it. Anyone who reckons that more than 70% of
>>> the people in the UK (or anywhere) think "Doctor Who is
>>> produced to sexually groom children is pure delusional.
>>> (Really!)
>>
>> Watch The Boys. It might even be more than 70%
> 
> No thanks. I am not the sort of person who goes around watching
> boys. What do you think I am, a priest?!

You are totally clueless.

> 
>>>> We're talking about the real world not radw.
>>>
>>> That's funny, as I was, and your reply was (as quoted above)
>>> "The majority here agree with me". So where is "here" then?
>>>
>>> Once again, you fail to read what you reply to properly and
>>> choose to move the goal posts in a discussion. That is one of
>>> your Yadisms.
>>
>> You are the one moving the goalposts. The real world agrees
>> with me, not you.
> 
> Whether that is the case or not, it is not what I typed! You
> also typed "The majority here agree with me" which quite clearly
> means YOU were on about RADW too!!!

What I typed is 100% accurate. The majority of RADW agrees with me 
because the majority of the real world agrees with me. Just look at the 
ratings.

> 
>>>> I don't have a television. Not had one for the past 6
>>>> years.
>>>
>>> You can switch off a PC too yer know!
>>>
>>
>> Why should I? Power cycling fucks up you capacitors and coils.
> 
> Plus, you can't be downloading 'stuff' all night long if you
> don't leave it on!
> 

I don't need to download stuff all night.

>>>> Doctor Who ended in 2017.
>>>
>>> I think I have heard that somewhere before alright. It's not
>>> true though. But, what I do know is, the current season of
>>> Doctor Who ends on Saturday.
>>
>> Doctor Who has not been made since 2017. There's is nothing in
>> the characters, story lines, or manner of writing of Doctor
>> Whoke that suggests even remotely that it is Doctor Who.
>> Doctor Who is not a monster from another dimension and is
>> about the effect of science and technology on civilization,
>> not about homosexuality and 21st century social issues and one
>> sided revisionist falsification of history.
> 
> Well, stay tuned and you might just get to see the show
> cancelled in the coming months... won't you be a happy bunny
> then?

Everyone that actually loves Doctor Who will be rejoicing when Doctor 
Whoke is cancelled.

> 
>>>> I've don't watch those channels on YouTube very often
>>>> since I know that the agree with me. Most of the stuff I
>>>> watch on YouTube are maths, engineering, science, and home
>>>> improvement videos.
>>>
>>> Good for you. Now try watching a few about replying to what
>>> people actually say not what you think they said.
>>>
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========