| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<10196gn$3pd33$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: encapsulating directory operations Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 09:39:51 +0100 Organization: Fix this later Lines: 25 Message-ID: <10196gn$3pd33$1@dont-email.me> References: <100h650$23r5l$1@dont-email.me> <20250520065158.709@kylheku.com> <100i2la$292le$1@dont-email.me> <87a5770xjw.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <100j09o$2f04b$1@dont-email.me> <87tt5ezx9y.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <100j4t3$2foah$1@dont-email.me> <87ldqqzfj0.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <100kak8$2q0s6$1@dont-email.me> <87a575zvmb.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <100o3sc$3ll6t$1@dont-email.me> <87bjrkxonr.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <b7fb8fc41d43807641e673e1ca1d3baf69f5766f@i2pn2.org> <87iklrtcys.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250523132019.763@kylheku.com> <100qm76$7shk$2@dont-email.me> <20250523140729.787@kylheku.com> <100qru0$9mjb$2@dont-email.me> <101929h$3olom$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 10:39:52 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d4ef7ab54f4e5f7459b22bf192843442"; logging-data="3978339"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18CfZd4Y2YhYkHM1wmUdrO2upX+6vhVWc3Zrxp5xZCrQQ==" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:t63KxvPfYRK7scYyj3o2/5CrnK8= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <101929h$3olom$4@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2462 On 29/05/2025 08:27, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Fri, 23 May 2025 23:13:20 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote: > >> And who cares about future instability if C90 remains just as stable as >> ever it was? > > Even with the problems with const? > > char *strstr(const char *haystack, const char *needle); > > Dennis Ritchie pointed out the trouble with that. Is C90 perfect? No, of course not. "C is quirky, flawed, and an enormous success." Is there value in having a powerful, widely-available language that, when you turn your back for a moment, stays *exactly* where you left it? Hell, yes. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within