| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1019bs7$3qdor$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: encapsulating directory operations Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 06:11:17 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 18 Message-ID: <1019bs7$3qdor$1@dont-email.me> References: <100h650$23r5l$1@dont-email.me> <20250520065158.709@kylheku.com> <100i2la$292le$1@dont-email.me> <87a5770xjw.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <100j09o$2f04b$1@dont-email.me> <87tt5ezx9y.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <100j4t3$2foah$1@dont-email.me> <87ldqqzfj0.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <100kak8$2q0s6$1@dont-email.me> <87a575zvmb.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <100o3sc$3ll6t$1@dont-email.me> <87bjrkxonr.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <b7fb8fc41d43807641e673e1ca1d3baf69f5766f@i2pn2.org> <87iklrtcys.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250523132019.763@kylheku.com> <100qm76$7shk$2@dont-email.me> <20250523140729.787@kylheku.com> <100qru0$9mjb$2@dont-email.me> <101929h$3olom$4@dont-email.me> <10196gn$3pd33$1@dont-email.me> <10199t2$3q3mn$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 12:11:20 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3d0c65b4d4c802596e770beef0b4ae12"; logging-data="4011803"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19UXBEr19H8DuQR+pedZBc9UmmXFuQxGQY=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:xpNh2eEc+ydYyHJIfZyyUd3Dyr0= In-Reply-To: <10199t2$3q3mn$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2666 On 5/29/25 05:37, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2025 09:39:51 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote: .... >> Is C90 perfect? No, of course not. > > Is there some value in that particular state of imperfection? Like the > Amish, whose concept of the ideal level of technology is the one that was > in effect at the time they were founded? And who have remained stuck at > that point in time ever since? That's not actually the case. The Amish have slowly adopted more advanced levels of technology as the people around them have adopted farm more advanced ones. The important thing, from their point of view, it not a particular level of technology, but to maintain a clear distinction between them and the non-Amish. Which means that they are more adaptable than Richard is. Also note that different groups of Amish have different attitudes about what the correct technology level is.