| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<101ajmq$2gb1$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: encapsulating directory operations Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 14:31:06 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 42 Message-ID: <101ajmq$2gb1$2@dont-email.me> References: <100h650$23r5l$1@dont-email.me> <100o3sc$3ll6t$1@dont-email.me> <87bjrkxonr.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <b7fb8fc41d43807641e673e1ca1d3baf69f5766f@i2pn2.org> <87iklrtcys.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250523132019.763@kylheku.com> <100qm76$7shk$2@dont-email.me> <20250523140729.787@kylheku.com> <100qru0$9mjb$2@dont-email.me> <101929h$3olom$4@dont-email.me> <10196gn$3pd33$1@dont-email.me> <10199t2$3q3mn$1@dont-email.me> <1019bs7$3qdor$1@dont-email.me> <1019kl9$3s5co$2@dont-email.me> <uL_ZP.269662$MKx.192501@fx13.iad> <101a2e5$3v0mf$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 23:31:07 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="53bec1a29c2f60a80eca805e6c6c3cf8"; logging-data="82273"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Xn4/zhncywsNh1B5DJVucxKWe2w9gSC8=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:+vQsl8a79Ty6PYSlKwJRptW0u3o= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <101a2e5$3v0mf$1@dont-email.me> On 5/29/2025 9:36 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote: > On 29/05/2025 16:08, Scott Lurndal wrote: >> Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes: >>> On 29/05/2025 11:11, James Kuyper wrote: >>>> On 5/29/25 05:37, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 29 May 2025 09:39:51 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote: >>>> ... >>>>>> Is C90 perfect? No, of course not. >>>>> >>>>> Is there some value in that particular state of imperfection? Like the >>>>> Amish, whose concept of the ideal level of technology is the one >>>>> that was >>>>> in effect at the time they were founded? And who have remained >>>>> stuck at >>>>> that point in time ever since? >>>> >>>> That's not actually the case. The Amish have slowly adopted more >>>> advanced levels of technology as the people around them have adopted >>>> farm more advanced ones. The important thing, from their point of view, >>>> it not a particular level of technology, but to maintain a clear >>>> distinction between them and the non-Amish. >>>> Which means that they are more adaptable than Richard is. >>> >>> They use a lot of C++, do they? >> >> They do love power tools. > > :-) > > If you want to take down a tree in a hurry, a chainsaw is just the job, > but more delicate work requires more delicate tools. > > More to the point, if you have a million lines of legacy code all > written in C90, it's a bloody good idea to keep a C90 compiler around > because maintenance. > The Amish, from Family Guy: https://youtu.be/-wlwtpH1ldM LOL! They are quite efficient!