Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Bad faith and dishonesty
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 18:12:02 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <101am3i$3v9gr$11@dont-email.me>
References: <m99YP.725664$B6tf.610565@fx02.ams4>
 <100uct4$184ak$1@dont-email.me> <100v9ta$1d5lg$7@dont-email.me>
 <1011eai$1urdm$1@dont-email.me> <10121bt$22da5$4@dont-email.me>
 <8bb5266e35845a4d8f2feb618c0c18629c04e4e7@i2pn2.org>
 <1012oj1$278f8$1@dont-email.me>
 <1196d9de2e2aebc1b6d1a85047192e8ea1aeb1f1@i2pn2.org>
 <10137lv$2djeu$1@dont-email.me> <ewIZP.135645$vK4b.131815@fx09.ams4>
 <1017l6l$3cerk$1@dont-email.me> <1017tr1$3drlu$5@dont-email.me>
 <1017ufm$3e54m$6@dont-email.me> <1019vm1$3u8nj$3@dont-email.me>
 <101a65n$3vsp7$1@dont-email.me> <101a86h$3vfam$6@dont-email.me>
 <101a9np$gl7$1@dont-email.me> <101ab0d$10eg$1@dont-email.me>
 <101abbb$gl7$3@dont-email.me> <101aca4$17rj$1@dont-email.me>
 <101ag45$1sm1$2@dont-email.me> <101agen$1ngr$2@dont-email.me>
 <101agub$1sm2$1@dont-email.me> <101aiq4$2ee1$1@dont-email.me>
 <101ake7$1sm1$6@dont-email.me> <101alr3$2s24$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 00:12:02 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="556f688ada1f57db8ff8bf19eae5e69a";
	logging-data="4171291"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1864h03R9k0zfrqgclE8swf"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2/eIpv9gJEjfCGFq4ofKPWJtdIg=
In-Reply-To: <101alr3$2s24$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US

On 5/29/2025 6:07 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 5/29/2025 4:43 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 29/05/2025 22:15, olcott wrote:
>>> On 5/29/2025 3:43 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>> On 29/05/2025 21:35, olcott wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I will always ignore every single point that you ever
>>>>> make until we have mutual agreement on this point.
>>>>
>>>> Why should I agree to something that's Just Plain Wrong?
>>>>
>>>
>>> If it is actually wrong then you could provide
>>> the reasoning showing this.
>>
>> Done that. You ignored me. 
> 
> *So in other words 

You agreed that Richard is correct by failing to explain why he is wrong.