Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Bad faith and dishonesty
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 18:29:59 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <101aqln$3fd3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <m99YP.725664$B6tf.610565@fx02.ams4>
 <100uct4$184ak$1@dont-email.me> <100v9ta$1d5lg$7@dont-email.me>
 <1011eai$1urdm$1@dont-email.me> <10121bt$22da5$4@dont-email.me>
 <8bb5266e35845a4d8f2feb618c0c18629c04e4e7@i2pn2.org>
 <1012oj1$278f8$1@dont-email.me>
 <1196d9de2e2aebc1b6d1a85047192e8ea1aeb1f1@i2pn2.org>
 <10137lv$2djeu$1@dont-email.me> <ewIZP.135645$vK4b.131815@fx09.ams4>
 <1017l6l$3cerk$1@dont-email.me> <1017tr1$3drlu$5@dont-email.me>
 <1017ufm$3e54m$6@dont-email.me> <1019vm1$3u8nj$3@dont-email.me>
 <101a65n$3vsp7$1@dont-email.me> <101a86h$3vfam$6@dont-email.me>
 <101a9np$gl7$1@dont-email.me> <101ab0d$10eg$1@dont-email.me>
 <101abbb$gl7$3@dont-email.me> <101aca4$17rj$1@dont-email.me>
 <101ag45$1sm1$2@dont-email.me> <101agen$1ngr$2@dont-email.me>
 <101agub$1sm2$1@dont-email.me> <101aiq4$2ee1$1@dont-email.me>
 <101ake7$1sm1$6@dont-email.me> <101alr3$2s24$2@dont-email.me>
 <101apgc$3mu1$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 01:30:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="73dc11aa65be162e0b0150944dd1d14a";
	logging-data="114083"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+0U/OUtZkbZUeK8ddsAGEU"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RpByzVm6rsXomFDgBbpmysk2LnU=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250529-4, 5/29/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <101apgc$3mu1$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US

On 5/29/2025 6:10 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> On 29/05/2025 23:07, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/29/2025 4:43 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>> On 29/05/2025 22:15, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 5/29/2025 3:43 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why should I agree to something that's Just Plain Wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If it is actually wrong then you could provide
>>>> the reasoning showing this.
>>>
>>> Done that. You ignored me. 
>>
>> *So in other words you have nothing*
> 
> I have nothing you haven't ignored.
> 

I only address one point at a time. If you make more
than one point I will never see the second one.

Because it is impossible to correctly refute a tautology
I know that you never did that.

It is a tautology that any input D to simulating termination
analyzer H that *would never stop running unless aborted*
DOES SPECIFY NON-TERMINATING BEHAVIOR.

> And you have nothing you've proved.
> 

The meaning of the above words completely prove
that they are totally true.

*This is over-your-head*
In epistemology (theory of knowledge), a self-evident
proposition is a proposition that is known to be true by
understanding its meaning without proof...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-evidence


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer