Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: x <x@x.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 16:30:39 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 121
Message-ID: <101aqmv$405r$1@dont-email.me>
References: <bee82c477b86c0caf1c30da405ed870f@www.novabbs.com>
 <68361DFD.1876@ix.netcom.com> <6838835D.4BDF@ix.netcom.com>
 <683883C1.6784@ix.netcom.com> <683886CB.438@ix.netcom.com>
 <6838A3A6.54E5@ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 01:30:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ad55d15d51a82f7838179b880bacd0f7";
	logging-data="131259"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+jriCdRmywJiFKSMWZhu/ecbkgQXleMhU="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y6wlYO08olhVMXfH0iOmFwtmQMM=
In-Reply-To: <6838A3A6.54E5@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3967

On 5/29/25 11:12, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Particle wave duality is no longer accepted as it has been
>>>>>> experimentally disproven.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The question regarding photons is still disputed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Did We Get the Double Slit Experiment All Wrong?"
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpMcC-E5l5c
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Light is a wave and not a particle.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no "duality" of a wave and a particle, but it is a particle
>>>>> wave.
>>>>
>>>> Yous guys are too close to the ocean to sea the particle.
>>>>
>>>> If you ask a fish
>>>> does the ocean waves
>>>> affect your in any way?
>>>>
>>>> The fish wil be puzzled.
>>>>
>>>> He'll say, "What ocean waves?, those are particles!"
>>>>
>>>> You say to the fish "Don't you feel wet?"
>>>>
>>>> He'll say "What's wet?"
>>>
>>> When I go to the beach and jump into the ocean...
>>>
>>> I can feel all those particles.
>>
>> A fish doesn't breathe ocean waves...
>>
>> a fish breathes ...particles.
>>
>> A person doesn't breathe air waves..
>>
>> a person breathes ...particles, air particles.
>>
>> Is the fish wet?
>>
>> The fish
>> swims
>> in the
>> same ocean
>> as you do.
>>
>> Remove the gravity..
>> and you are swiming
>>   like a fish.
>>
>> Are you wet?
>>
>> What's wet?
> 
> okay, i knows yous guys don't understand Real World Physics...
> (especially since yous graduated from Google High or wiki university)
> 
> The ocean
> is Blue.
> 
> Now, I'm not
> talking about
> that thing
> you call
> the wet
> ocean blue...
> (where all the fishes live)
> 
> i'm talking about
> the sky ocean blue.
> 
> 
> The sky is Blue.
> 
> It begins
> way up there..
> and it ends way down there.
> 
> Now, down there
> would be where you are
> standing on...
> and way up there
> would be around
> 70 miles.
> 
> 
> So, the sky ocean blue.
> 
> (the sky is an ocean)
> (and it is blue)
> 
> means..
> 
> you are living
> at the bottom
> of the ocean.

Yes the people of the world are insane meaning not true.

This is because they believe that images and sounds portrayed
by machines called television sets and radios are true.

It might be that something like 'chemistry' with 'orbitals'
and the like exists, but when they try to 'prove' it with
images and sounds from televisions and radios they fail
to understand how totally they have retreated into gibberish
for their supposed 'proofs'.