| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<101bqvo$d9rp$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: encapsulating directory operations Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 18:41:21 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 39 Message-ID: <101bqvo$d9rp$1@dont-email.me> References: <100h650$23r5l$1@dont-email.me><87ecwj1vy9.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <100hieb$261k5$1@dont-email.me><100hs85$27qbn$1@dont-email.me> <100i14o$28o7d$1@dont-email.me><100ia33$2ae8t$1@dont-email.me> <100ists$2eaej$1@dont-email.me><100j8t8$2g75r$5@dont-email.me> <100k636$2p061$1@dont-email.me> <10191uh$3olom$2@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 10:41:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e06963cf3b56a88416800ec42106a6dc"; logging-data="436089"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Bcm9cmVoNOHxdEOWAptuXaONIliGHYAQ=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:lgwPtq0gqtb4xOMhBQJtn5IkSu0= X-Priority: 3 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Bytes: 2604 "Lawrence D'Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in message news:10191uh$3olom$2@dont-email.me... > On Wed, 21 May 2025 19:23:45 +1000, Paul Edwards wrote: > > > "Lawrence D'Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in message > > news:100j8t8$2g75r$5@dont-email.me... > >> > >> On Wed, 21 May 2025 07:41:12 +1000, Paul Edwards wrote: > >> > >> > Basically the software industry is a joke. The advances have all been > >> > done by hardware engineers. > >> > >> Didn't they use software to manage that? > > > > Yes - as the guy (Jeff) said - software written by lunatics/artists. > > Was RCU invented by the hardware guys, or the software guys? > > What about journalling? Two-phase commit? Diffie-Hellman? RSA? Kerberos? > kexec? I'm not disputing advances in computer science. Three way diff would be my favorite. It then needs to be incorporated into a professional product. Which is properly funded, understood, someone has pride in the integrity of the product, and bugs reports are always addressed with professionalism - no matter what is required. Literally to the ends of the earth. If they ever needed more money to fix a bug, they'd just jack up the prices they charge. In other words, MVS (z/OS). I doubt that the original author (Jeff) was working on z/OS when he wrote about the shambles he saw. BFN. Paul.