| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<101cu1t$k4u8$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Distros specifically designed for children Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 19:39:57 +0100 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 24 Message-ID: <101cu1t$k4u8$3@dont-email.me> References: <100lcd7$30vat$1@dont-email.me> <m96s6gFrc9cU1@mid.individual.net> <100le5o$318dd$1@dont-email.me> <100ljn1$30vat$2@dont-email.me> <slrn1032jne.29j.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <6831b9a7$0$8595$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <slrn1035np2.84f.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <6832fab9$0$11442$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <10102st$1j2ov$1@dont-email.me> <slrn1038j7q.6c4.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <10131ao$28rgm$1@dont-email.me> <slrn103b9mg.9o3.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <1015efc$2rf1i$5@dont-email.me> <slrn103e0mk.q9d.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <10187sr$3g8km$3@dont-email.me> <slrn103gim4.19bc.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <101cd5n$g8ec$3@dont-email.me> <101ci2b$hnhe$3@dont-email.me> <101cm3c$ijf6$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 20:39:58 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3803e1575b3525ea50b866051c1b3cd4"; logging-data="660424"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+rovf7R2GSfsVbR4CvmNbo3MheDz0csSQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:P01VVLxPvvHOr/QyKvdmKx/19pc= In-Reply-To: <101cm3c$ijf6$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-GB On 30/05/2025 17:24, Nuno Silva wrote: > On 2025-05-30, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> On 30/05/2025 14:51, Nuno Silva wrote: >>> Why, again, did FAT become so popular for removable media, >>> despite its shortcomings? >> It's called the lowest common denominator. Or the highest common factor. >> EVERYTHING reads and writes FAT. > > Yes. The point being: why was there a need for such denominator to be > FAT* and not a more robust (set of) filesystem(s)? > > Surely it wasn't fragmentation in the linux world that caused it :-) > No. It was the prevalence of Windows boxen. *You* can reformat removable media in ext2 if you want. The average windows user has trouble just plugging it in -- "I guess a rattlesnake ain't risponsible fer bein' a rattlesnake, but ah puts mah heel on um jess the same if'n I catches him around mah chillun".