| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<101cvdv$kh09$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Bad faith and dishonesty
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 14:03:26 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <101cvdv$kh09$2@dont-email.me>
References: <m99YP.725664$B6tf.610565@fx02.ams4>
<100uct4$184ak$1@dont-email.me> <100v9ta$1d5lg$7@dont-email.me>
<1011eai$1urdm$1@dont-email.me> <10121bt$22da5$4@dont-email.me>
<8bb5266e35845a4d8f2feb618c0c18629c04e4e7@i2pn2.org>
<1012oj1$278f8$1@dont-email.me>
<1196d9de2e2aebc1b6d1a85047192e8ea1aeb1f1@i2pn2.org>
<10137lv$2djeu$1@dont-email.me> <ewIZP.135645$vK4b.131815@fx09.ams4>
<1017l6l$3cerk$1@dont-email.me> <1017tr1$3drlu$5@dont-email.me>
<1017ufm$3e54m$6@dont-email.me> <1019vm1$3u8nj$3@dont-email.me>
<101a65n$3vsp7$1@dont-email.me> <101a86h$3vfam$6@dont-email.me>
<101a9np$gl7$1@dont-email.me> <101bt7o$58on$1@dont-email.me>
<101cis6$hv12$1@dont-email.me> <101cjjo$hqle$2@dont-email.me>
<101cmga$imoa$1@dont-email.me> <101cohp$ikgf$4@dont-email.me>
<101cppa$j97s$1@dont-email.me> <101cqs1$j925$1@dont-email.me>
<101cst5$ikgf$5@dont-email.me> <101cu21$k77f$1@dont-email.me>
<101cuid$j925$2@dont-email.me> <101cv2d$ikgf$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 21:03:27 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="73dc11aa65be162e0b0150944dd1d14a";
logging-data="672777"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18FDzAOswm4LMV5/ya7jp0W"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ODyi92OU7Jehg+4UP6WL4nXy+5U=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250530-6, 5/30/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <101cv2d$ikgf$6@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
On 5/30/2025 1:57 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> On 30/05/2025 19:48, dbush wrote:
>> On 5/30/2025 2:40 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 5/30/2025 1:20 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>>>
>>>> +++++
>>>> Let us suppose that there is such a process; that is to say, that we
>>>> can invent a machine <D- which, when supplied with the S.D of any
>>>> computing machine i l will test this S.D and if i l is circular will
>>>> mark the S.D with the symbol "u" and if it is circle-free will mark
>>>> it with " s ".
>>>> +++++
>>>>
>>>> By "the S.D. of any computing machine" he means the 'standard
>>>> description' of >>>>any<<<< Turing machine.
>>>>
>>>> HHH is not that process, and thus HHH has no bearing whatsoever on
>>>> the Turing proof.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It is a verified fact that
>
> HHH is not that process, and thus HHH has no bearing whatsoever on the
> Turing proof.
>
IT DOES YET YOU INSIST ON LYING ABOUT THIS.
int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
The input to HHH(DD) SPECIFIES A NON-HALTING
SEQUENCE OF CONFIGURATIONS.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer