Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<101df7s$nrpr$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Rewriting SSA. Is This A Chance For GNU/Linux?
Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 00:33:16 +0100
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <101df7s$nrpr$2@dont-email.me>
References: <pan$54963$b3f3d4e6$ae35ff46$71fe05c9@linux.rocks>
 <gXCdnTD2YLRBaHX6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <m4tf1dFmvh3U1@mid.individual.net> <vsd0ui$365s0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vsds7u$2u8h$1@dont-email.me> <101bmca$cc5u$2@dont-email.me>
 <20250530105929.00000a4e@gmail.com>
 <231k3kdedo3ehicbstcluh3lb4440tro86@4ax.com>
 <wNqdnWk_NvaHmKf1nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 01:33:16 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ca28cd1bb688aa049361b0e5f3fc82fd";
	logging-data="782139"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19bgsM98TYW5BqTtFOzkEMumYRAr2bxeFY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9y6uj4Bz/GJwtfHm0UAcGtuKRwc=
In-Reply-To: <wNqdnWk_NvaHmKf1nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-GB

On 30/05/2025 20:21, % wrote:
> Joel wrote:
>> John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 30 May 2025 07:22:51 -0000 (UTC)
>>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well, I guess that’s over, now that Elon Musk has left the building.
>>>> That’s the end of DOGE, without “saving” anywhere near the trillion
>>>> dollars he originally promised.
>>>
>>> Comes as a *total* shock, lemmetellya.
>>
>>
>> Let's say they had cut that much with this DOGE BS (not that it's 100%
>> a stupid idea, of course, but they were not approaching very
>> rationally), wouldn't the proposed tax breaks offset it?  Wouldn't we
>> still be spending a large fortune every year on the damn military?
>>
> no because there would be tariffs that go to trumps pocket

Military spending is pretty low in reality.

And it is a *pragmatic* program, whereas so much is spent on purely 
*moral* initiatives to employ people who think they can therefore tell 
how to run your life better than you can yourself.

-- 
"Anyone who believes that the laws of physics are mere social 
conventions is invited to try transgressing those conventions from the 
windows of my apartment. (I live on the twenty-first floor.) "

Alan Sokal