Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<101f69q$173bb$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Bad faith and dishonesty
Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 10:12:57 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 75
Message-ID: <101f69q$173bb$1@dont-email.me>
References: <m99YP.725664$B6tf.610565@fx02.ams4>
 <100uct4$184ak$1@dont-email.me> <100v9ta$1d5lg$7@dont-email.me>
 <1011eai$1urdm$1@dont-email.me> <10121bt$22da5$4@dont-email.me>
 <8bb5266e35845a4d8f2feb618c0c18629c04e4e7@i2pn2.org>
 <1012oj1$278f8$1@dont-email.me>
 <1196d9de2e2aebc1b6d1a85047192e8ea1aeb1f1@i2pn2.org>
 <10137lv$2djeu$1@dont-email.me> <ewIZP.135645$vK4b.131815@fx09.ams4>
 <1017l6l$3cerk$1@dont-email.me> <1017tr1$3drlu$5@dont-email.me>
 <1017ufm$3e54m$6@dont-email.me> <1019vm1$3u8nj$3@dont-email.me>
 <101a65n$3vsp7$1@dont-email.me> <101a86h$3vfam$6@dont-email.me>
 <101a9np$gl7$1@dont-email.me> <101bt7o$58on$1@dont-email.me>
 <101cis6$hv12$1@dont-email.me> <101cjjo$hqle$2@dont-email.me>
 <101cmga$imoa$1@dont-email.me> <101cohp$ikgf$4@dont-email.me>
 <101cppa$j97s$1@dont-email.me> <101eiu1$124bt$1@dont-email.me>
 <101ek4u$12895$2@dont-email.me> <101f0nd$15ik4$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 17:12:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c9a131a468f55446a50ed4b18f7c4193";
	logging-data="1281387"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+HvRmsUd8+zhtEit4jllN3"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:28s8B8MOdR+HX5qZ+4uCSEqlE90=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250531-2, 5/31/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <101f0nd$15ik4$1@dont-email.me>

On 5/31/2025 8:37 AM, Mike Terry wrote:
> On 31/05/2025 11:03, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 31/05/2025 10:42, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2025-05-30 17:27:05 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> On 5/30/2025 12:06 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>> As far as I can recall, Olcott's ramblings never go within discus- 
>>>>> throwing distance of a potentially erroneous step.
>>>>
>>>> There is no *INPUT* D to termination analyzer H
>>>> that can possibly do the opposite of whatever
>>>> value that H returns.
>>>
>>> We can apply Truing'c construction to every Truing machine and
>>>  prove that no Turing machine is a halting decider. With a
>>> similar construction many other problems about Turing machine
>>> behaviour can be proven uncomputable, too.
>>
>> Indeed. In fact, if I'm reading Mr Olcott's retort correctly...
>>
>> Turing: imagine a program P...
>> Turing: ...argument goes here...
>> Turing: ...and it turns out that P can't exist.
>> Olcott: Turing is wrong, because P can't exist.
>>
>> I /seeeeee.../
>>
> 
> More like:
> 
> Turing: imagine a program P...
> Turing: ...modify P as follows to create D...
> Turing: ...argument goes here...
> Turing: ...so P decides D's halting incorrectly
> Turing: ...and so P is not a halt decider.
> Olcott: Turing is wrong, because *D* can't exist.
> 
> I /seeeeee.../
> 
> Mike.
> 

Turing wasn't even dealing with halting.
No one referred to this as the halting problem
until 1958 in a book by Martin Davis.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235222082100050X

*Here is the orignal Linz proof*
https://www.liarparadox.org/Linz_Proof.pdf

In the following embedded_H is P and ⟨Ĥ⟩ is D

When Ĥ is applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qy ∞
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qn

(a) Ĥ copies its input ⟨Ĥ⟩
(b) Ĥ invokes embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩
(c) embedded_H simulates ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩
(d) simulated ⟨Ĥ⟩ copies its input ⟨Ĥ⟩
(e) simulated ⟨Ĥ⟩ invokes simulated embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩
(f) simulated embedded_H simulates ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩
(g) goto (d) with one more level of simulation

It is at step (f) that embedded_H correctly
determines that its simulated ⟨Ĥ⟩ cannot possibly
reach its own simulated ⟨Ĥ.qn⟩ final halt state.


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer