Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<101f8sh$25s$1@panix2.panix.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!.POSTED.2602:f977:0:1::2!not-for-mail
From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,alt.usage.english
Subject: Re: 25 Classic Books That Have Been Banned
Date: Sat, 31 May 2025 11:57:05 -0400 (EDT)
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Message-ID: <101f8sh$25s$1@panix2.panix.com>
References: <vp5tl3$hq3$1@panix2.panix.com> <tkjj3kd1fffvd03c6hsbqjjf9qrjb3cm2u@4ax.com> <101ckaj$nkd$1@panix2.panix.com> <vk7m3k1g3vmb7jcan7lpr9ctg4j666jkmd@4ax.com>
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="2602:f977:0:1::2";
	logging-data="10561"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"

Paul S Person  <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:
>I read Kant when I read the collection known as /The Great Books of
>the Western World/. It took a while, but eventually it became clear:
>he was propping up Western culture on a secular basis. This is why he
>ends up with the same-old same-old ethics.

I don't think that is bad if they are good ethics.  

But I was not talking about his discussion of ethics, but his discussion
of reality vs. perception and the phenomenal vs. nouminal world.
--scott

-- 
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."