Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: RTD's Lazy Writing
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 14:07:30 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 157
Message-ID: <101hjaj$242li$2@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0p6j4lj1ecvxq007@post.eweka.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 15:07:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f157d60f0e530389d5f4c2eded935cd6";
	logging-data="2230962"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18WdoWlbIxSUHknUY0AJJzlrm2Hodlt2sQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aW34r50Lg13INx2Il5djcBUeDuM=
Content-Language: en-US, en-GB
In-Reply-To: <xn0p6j4lj1ecvxq007@post.eweka.nl>

On 01/06/2025 13:13, Blueshirt wrote:
> Okay, my thoughts...
> 
> In the book "The Writer's Tale" RTD said the one thing he hated
> was when people accused him of lazy writing. Well, I am going to
> do exactly that. In fact I am going to say RTD has no creativity
> whatsoever anymore and he is living on his past glories. He

He never had any creativity to begin with. Everything he wrote was based 
on 3 or 4 basic story briefs recycled over and over again and that's it.

> started his second era on Doctor Who by having Jodie Whittaker's
> Doctor regenerate in to David Tennant, brought back Donna Noble
> for some episodes, and now he's had Ncuti Gatwa regenerate into
> Billie Piper. Yes, we know the Tenth Doctor and Rose/Donna were
> very popular among the masses and Doctor Who got great ratings

David Tennant has now made himself almost as universally hated as Gary 
Lineker.

> back then, but this is not taking the show forward. It's just
> gimmick after gimmick. It's not clever, it shows a lack of fresh
> ideas and it is lazy fucking writing!
> 
> RTD is an old man out of touch with the younger generation but
> thinks he is trendy and cool and knows what that demographic
> want from a TV show... he has no idea and is just an old fart

He doesn't even know who the demographic that actually watches Doctor 
Who even is.

Let's tell him shall we: Intelligent White Heterosexual Men and those 
who aspire to being Intelligent White Heterosexual Men! So why is he 
writing the show for only for women who are lesbians, and of very low 
intelligence?

> trying to stay relevant. During his second tenure on the show
> all three of my children, all under 35, have stopped watching
> Doctor Who. This is in one family! They love "Stranger Things",

Race, Gender, and Identity politics was NEVER relevant to the younger 
generation, or to the older one either, or anybody except Russell T 
Davies and his degenerate woke clique of lesbian feminists and 
homosexuals that want to sexually groom children.

> "The Mandalorian", "Loki" (etc) so it's not like Sci-Fi/Fantasy
> genre TV shows are not up their street. They used to love
> watching Doctor Who, now they don't. They are not interested in
> gimmicks. To keep them watching something in 2025 with the many
> television channels and different streaming services out there
> they need engaging stories. Not a TV show that can't move
> forward and is too caught up with revisiting its past glories.
> If three people in one family are switching the show off,
> there's a problem!!!

How many times does Davies have to keep repeating racism is bad, sexism 
is bad, men are bad, heterosexuality is bad, and capitalism is bad? 
Can't he think of anything else to say? People are sick and tired of it.

The degenerate pervert wants to use this negativity he has created 
against 97% of the population in order to make out that homosexuality is 
what they all should aspire to in order to be good. It's classic 
aversion therapy straight out of George Orwell.

> 
> What was the point of Omega? All that build up for two minutes!
> That could have been any alien creature with a big claw. It
> didn't need to be Omega at all.

And you wonder why there are no Daleks, Cybermen, Sontarans, or Ice 
Warriors in any episodes anymore. All the build up to nothing.

> 
> What was the point of bringing The Rani back? All that build up
> with Mrs Flood, and she's gone in under two episodes.
> 
> What about Belinda Chandra? A tough no-nonsense companion we
> were told, a companion who wouldn't take any nonsense from the
> Doctor. Then there's this magic date that she has to be back on
> Earth for... or else!!! It then turns out she has to be back
> home to mind her daughter. All that build up and she's basically
> a stay at home Mum.

And there was no foreshadowing of it whatsoever to give the viewer a 
clue. All of it was inserted retrospectivly in shoehorned scenes in the 
final episode to make the audience look like fools thinking they'd 
missed it

> 
> What about mavity? What's that all been about then? Since 2023!
> Are we going to have another year of it? It's nonsense.
> 

Not only that but also bi-generation, the Indian Isaac Newton, the 
constant use of unexplained magic instead of science, making 
regeneration into some sort superpower, and cartoon logic. It's all 
nonsense.

> Why bring back Jodie Whittaker? I have no problem with her

Another gimmick.

> Doctor but her scene was completely unnecessary and didn't
> advance the story in any way. So it looks like she was just
> brought back to give two fingers to the fans who didn't
> like her.

She was brought back like Tennant and Donna Noble in order to try and 
give this total unbelievable bullshit some kind of credibility with the 
few remaining fans.

> 
> Why bring Susan back? For what, a thirty second cameo? Yes, RTD,
> a nice idea, but as always with you, poorly realised and
> irrelevant.

Why bring the Doctor's granddaughter back and then claim that he can't 
have children because he's sterile like all the Time Lords. But he's not 
a fucking Time Lord though is he? He's the fucking Timeless Child 
Monster who never went through any kind of natural selection to deprive 
its species of the ability to reproduce.

How did he have children who had Susan? She was fully established as 
being a Time Lady in The Name of the Doctor. If she's not his biological 
granddaughter then what is he doing abducting a child from Gallifrey? 
Why are there children on Galifrey anyway for Time Lords can't have them?

At least when Lungburrow tried to do this sterility bullshit it 
established Looming and the Other first to explaine both. RTD doesn't 
have a fucking clue how to write.

> 
> I could go on... Ruby Sunday finding her real Mum that we don't
> hear anymore about, the baby stolen by the Rani, Sutekh last
> year... even the Belinda-Mundy Flynn thing. It's all idea after
> idea, that might lead somewhere, often it doesn't. More

It's the writing of an infantile uneducated child that doesn't even 
understand how to play with Lego and follow the illustrations on the box 
to put the right coloured bricks together in the right places with each 
other, but instead puts together random coloured ones in random 
orientations to make something that barley looks likes what's on the 
box. That is woke writers for you.

> often than not it's just a waste of time. We get no proper
> character development at all. Everything is just a mess. Why
> can't we just have a decent fucking story, with a beginning, a
> middle, and an end. Is it too much to ask?
It is from the woke degenerates. They put fancy wrapping paper around 
pieces of shit in order to entice people to take it so that they can be 
fed with the messages that it's disguising.

-- 
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it 
stands for." --William Shatner