Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2025-05-30 (Friday)
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 07:32:55 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <101hoao$25pro$1@dont-email.me>
References: <101f8mn$17v12$1@dont-email.me> <101fbbh$18jp5$1@dont-email.me>
 <101fphn$1ekkp$1@dont-email.me>
 <1884763560.770447820.633656.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 16:32:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="679c9e1314dba6269565e42132fa4658";
	logging-data="2287480"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/WPsogNE6AvVxIoCQ/2yZ8oF3sGNZG7U8="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oEvnvaa+S6dZ2ktezKEnvg2ZJV4=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250601-2, 6/1/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <1884763560.770447820.633656.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>

On 5/31/2025 10:18 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
> Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote:
>> On 5/31/2025 9:39 AM, Ian J. Ball wrote:
>>> On 5/31/25 8:54 AM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
>>>
>>>> What Did You Watch?
>>>
>>> I had to finalize and submit grading for the year, so I didn't watch
>>> anything "fun" yesterday. (I should finish out "Andor" today!)
>>>
>>> So what I did get through yesterday was...:
>>>
>> snip
>>> What did you watch?
>>>
>>
>>
>> I watched:
>>
>>
>> Jurassic Park (4K disc) 1993 movie directed by Steven Spielberg based on
>> the Michael Crichton novel about a theme park full of killer dinosaurs.
>> What could go wrong?
>>
>>
>> Sherlock & Daughter - "Sound Connections" - The latest episode.  Just
>> above background noise.
> 
> At least somebody finally told the silly daughter that the reason Sherlock
> claimed he never met her mother was because she was using a different name!
> 
> 
> 

But didn't she show him a picture?  The proper response would be I know 
that woman, but when I knew her she went by a different name.  Or she 
looks like someone I knew, but that's not her name.  The comment about 
the daughter potentially being a con artist made more sense.